Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Understanding care closer to home for ill child...
View graph of relations

Understanding care closer to home for ill children and young people

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Understanding care closer to home for ill children and young people. / Spiers, Gemma; Gridley, Kate; Cusworth, Linda et al.
In: Nursing Children and Young People, Vol. 24, No. 5, 07.06.2012, p. 29-34.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Spiers, G, Gridley, K, Cusworth, L, Mukherjee, S, Parker, G, Heaton, J, Atkin, K, Birks, Y, Lowson, K & Wright, D 2012, 'Understanding care closer to home for ill children and young people', Nursing Children and Young People, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 29-34. https://doi.org/10.7748/ncyp2012.06.24.5.29.c9143

APA

Spiers, G., Gridley, K., Cusworth, L., Mukherjee, S., Parker, G., Heaton, J., Atkin, K., Birks, Y., Lowson, K., & Wright, D. (2012). Understanding care closer to home for ill children and young people. Nursing Children and Young People, 24(5), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.7748/ncyp2012.06.24.5.29.c9143

Vancouver

Spiers G, Gridley K, Cusworth L, Mukherjee S, Parker G, Heaton J et al. Understanding care closer to home for ill children and young people. Nursing Children and Young People. 2012 Jun 7;24(5):29-34. doi: 10.7748/ncyp2012.06.24.5.29.c9143

Author

Spiers, Gemma ; Gridley, Kate ; Cusworth, Linda et al. / Understanding care closer to home for ill children and young people. In: Nursing Children and Young People. 2012 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. 29-34.

Bibtex

@article{6604dbf2a1bf45b78ff8fb08a99ed5da,
title = "Understanding care closer to home for ill children and young people",
abstract = "AIM: To gather evidence to support the implementation of standard six of the National Service Framework for Children, Young People and Maternity Services (Department of Health and Department for Education and Skills 2004), which states that care should be provided as close to home as possible.METHODS: A mixed methods study comprising of a systematic review, a national survey of provision of care closer to home (CCTH), four in-depth, qualitative case studies and a cost analysis.FINDINGS: The systematic review suggests that CCTH is no less clinically effective than hospital care. Services identified by the survey fall into three distinct models of provision. Case study data show that families preferred CCTH, but staff face difficulties at organisational and practice levels. Cost analysis suggests there can be cost savings with CCTH, but several factors influence these.CONCLUSION: CCTH may be an effective and feasible option for children and young people who are ill.",
keywords = "Child, Evidence-Based Nursing, Home Care Services, Humans, United Kingdom, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't",
author = "Gemma Spiers and Kate Gridley and Linda Cusworth and Suzanne Mukherjee and Gillian Parker and Janet Heaton and Karl Atkin and Yvonne Birks and Karin Lowson and Dianne Wright",
year = "2012",
month = jun,
day = "7",
doi = "10.7748/ncyp2012.06.24.5.29.c9143",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "29--34",
journal = "Nursing Children and Young People",
issn = "2046-2336",
publisher = "RCN Publishing Company",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding care closer to home for ill children and young people

AU - Spiers, Gemma

AU - Gridley, Kate

AU - Cusworth, Linda

AU - Mukherjee, Suzanne

AU - Parker, Gillian

AU - Heaton, Janet

AU - Atkin, Karl

AU - Birks, Yvonne

AU - Lowson, Karin

AU - Wright, Dianne

PY - 2012/6/7

Y1 - 2012/6/7

N2 - AIM: To gather evidence to support the implementation of standard six of the National Service Framework for Children, Young People and Maternity Services (Department of Health and Department for Education and Skills 2004), which states that care should be provided as close to home as possible.METHODS: A mixed methods study comprising of a systematic review, a national survey of provision of care closer to home (CCTH), four in-depth, qualitative case studies and a cost analysis.FINDINGS: The systematic review suggests that CCTH is no less clinically effective than hospital care. Services identified by the survey fall into three distinct models of provision. Case study data show that families preferred CCTH, but staff face difficulties at organisational and practice levels. Cost analysis suggests there can be cost savings with CCTH, but several factors influence these.CONCLUSION: CCTH may be an effective and feasible option for children and young people who are ill.

AB - AIM: To gather evidence to support the implementation of standard six of the National Service Framework for Children, Young People and Maternity Services (Department of Health and Department for Education and Skills 2004), which states that care should be provided as close to home as possible.METHODS: A mixed methods study comprising of a systematic review, a national survey of provision of care closer to home (CCTH), four in-depth, qualitative case studies and a cost analysis.FINDINGS: The systematic review suggests that CCTH is no less clinically effective than hospital care. Services identified by the survey fall into three distinct models of provision. Case study data show that families preferred CCTH, but staff face difficulties at organisational and practice levels. Cost analysis suggests there can be cost savings with CCTH, but several factors influence these.CONCLUSION: CCTH may be an effective and feasible option for children and young people who are ill.

KW - Child

KW - Evidence-Based Nursing

KW - Home Care Services

KW - Humans

KW - United Kingdom

KW - Journal Article

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

U2 - 10.7748/ncyp2012.06.24.5.29.c9143

DO - 10.7748/ncyp2012.06.24.5.29.c9143

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 22774663

VL - 24

SP - 29

EP - 34

JO - Nursing Children and Young People

JF - Nursing Children and Young People

SN - 2046-2336

IS - 5

ER -