Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Understanding the DSM-5

Electronic data

  • historypsychiatrystasisandchange

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, History of Psychiatry, 29 (1), 2018, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2018 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the History of Psychiatry page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/hpy on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 374 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Understanding the DSM-5: stasis and change

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Understanding the DSM-5: stasis and change. / Cooper, Rachel Valerie.
In: History of Psychiatry, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.03.2018, p. 49-65.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Cooper RV. Understanding the DSM-5: stasis and change. History of Psychiatry. 2018 Mar 1;29(1):49-65. Epub 2017 Nov 29. doi: 10.1177/0957154X17741783

Author

Cooper, Rachel Valerie. / Understanding the DSM-5 : stasis and change. In: History of Psychiatry. 2018 ; Vol. 29, No. 1. pp. 49-65.

Bibtex

@article{ef95a3e9f23f4620981797df8f8ac04a,
title = "Understanding the DSM-5: stasis and change",
abstract = "This paper aims to understand the DSM-5 through situating it within the context of the historical development of the DSM series. When one looks at the sets of diagnostic criteria, the DSM-5 is strikingly similar to the DSM-IV. I argue that at this level the DSM has become {\textquoteleft}locked-in{\textquoteright} and difficult to change. At the same time, at the structural, or conceptual, level there have been radical changes, for example, in the definition of {\textquoteleft}mental disorder{\textquoteright}, the role of theory and of values, and in the abandonment of multiaxial approach to diagnosis. The way that the DSM-5 was constructed means that the overall conceptual framework of the classification only barely constrains the sets of diagnostic criteria that it contains.",
keywords = "Conceptual framework, DSM-III, DSM-IV, DSM-5, lock-in",
author = "Cooper, {Rachel Valerie}",
note = "The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, History of Psychiatry, 29 (1), 2018, {\textcopyright} SAGE Publications Ltd, 2018 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the History of Psychiatry page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/hpy on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/",
year = "2018",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0957154X17741783",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "49--65",
journal = "History of Psychiatry",
issn = "0957-154X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the DSM-5

T2 - stasis and change

AU - Cooper, Rachel Valerie

N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, History of Psychiatry, 29 (1), 2018, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2018 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the History of Psychiatry page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/hpy on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - This paper aims to understand the DSM-5 through situating it within the context of the historical development of the DSM series. When one looks at the sets of diagnostic criteria, the DSM-5 is strikingly similar to the DSM-IV. I argue that at this level the DSM has become ‘locked-in’ and difficult to change. At the same time, at the structural, or conceptual, level there have been radical changes, for example, in the definition of ‘mental disorder’, the role of theory and of values, and in the abandonment of multiaxial approach to diagnosis. The way that the DSM-5 was constructed means that the overall conceptual framework of the classification only barely constrains the sets of diagnostic criteria that it contains.

AB - This paper aims to understand the DSM-5 through situating it within the context of the historical development of the DSM series. When one looks at the sets of diagnostic criteria, the DSM-5 is strikingly similar to the DSM-IV. I argue that at this level the DSM has become ‘locked-in’ and difficult to change. At the same time, at the structural, or conceptual, level there have been radical changes, for example, in the definition of ‘mental disorder’, the role of theory and of values, and in the abandonment of multiaxial approach to diagnosis. The way that the DSM-5 was constructed means that the overall conceptual framework of the classification only barely constrains the sets of diagnostic criteria that it contains.

KW - Conceptual framework

KW - DSM-III

KW - DSM-IV

KW - DSM-5

KW - lock-in

U2 - 10.1177/0957154X17741783

DO - 10.1177/0957154X17741783

M3 - Journal article

VL - 29

SP - 49

EP - 65

JO - History of Psychiatry

JF - History of Psychiatry

SN - 0957-154X

IS - 1

ER -