Standard
Understanding the Scope of Uncertainty in Dynamically Adaptive Systems. / Welsh, K.
; Sawyer, P. Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality 16th International Working Conference, REFSQ 2010, Essen, Germany, June 30–July 2, 2010. Proceedings. ed. / Roel Wieringa; Anne Persson. Berlin: Springer, 2010. p. 2-16 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 6182).
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review
Harvard
Welsh, K
& Sawyer, P 2010,
Understanding the Scope of Uncertainty in Dynamically Adaptive Systems. in R Wieringa & A Persson (eds),
Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality 16th International Working Conference, REFSQ 2010, Essen, Germany, June 30–July 2, 2010. Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6182, Springer, Berlin, pp. 2-16, Requirements Engineering Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ) 2010, Essen, Germany,
30/06/10.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14192-8_2APA
Welsh, K.
, & Sawyer, P. (2010).
Understanding the Scope of Uncertainty in Dynamically Adaptive Systems. In R. Wieringa, & A. Persson (Eds.),
Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality 16th International Working Conference, REFSQ 2010, Essen, Germany, June 30–July 2, 2010. Proceedings (pp. 2-16). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 6182). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14192-8_2Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
@inproceedings{7119f6d864bb4d53a91afc5545752aaa,
title = "Understanding the Scope of Uncertainty in Dynamically Adaptive Systems",
abstract = "[Context and motivation] Dynamically adaptive systems are increasingly conceived as a means to allow operation in changeable or poorly understood environments. [Question/problem] This can result in the selection of solution strategies based on assumptions that may not be well founded. [Principle ideas/results] This paper proposes the use of claims in goal models as a means to reason about likely sources of uncertainty in dynamically adaptive systems. Accepting that such claims can{\textquoteright}t be easily validated at design-time, we should instead evaluate how the system will behave if a claim is proven false by developing a validation scenario. [Contribution] Validation scenarios may be costly to evaluate so the approach we advocate is designed to carefully select only those claims that are less certain, or whose falsification would have serious consequences.",
keywords = "self adaptation , dynamically adaptive system, goal models , uncertainty , claims",
author = "K. Welsh and P. Sawyer",
year = "2010",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-14192-8_2",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-642-14191-1",
series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "2--16",
editor = "Roel Wieringa and Anne Persson",
booktitle = "Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality 16th International Working Conference, REFSQ 2010, Essen, Germany, June 30–July 2, 2010. Proceedings",
note = "Requirements Engineering Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ) 2010 ; Conference date: 30-06-2010 Through 02-07-2010",
}
RIS
TY - GEN
T1 - Understanding the Scope of Uncertainty in Dynamically Adaptive Systems
AU - Welsh, K.
AU - Sawyer, P.
PY - 2010/6/1
Y1 - 2010/6/1
N2 - [Context and motivation] Dynamically adaptive systems are increasingly conceived as a means to allow operation in changeable or poorly understood environments. [Question/problem] This can result in the selection of solution strategies based on assumptions that may not be well founded. [Principle ideas/results] This paper proposes the use of claims in goal models as a means to reason about likely sources of uncertainty in dynamically adaptive systems. Accepting that such claims can’t be easily validated at design-time, we should instead evaluate how the system will behave if a claim is proven false by developing a validation scenario. [Contribution] Validation scenarios may be costly to evaluate so the approach we advocate is designed to carefully select only those claims that are less certain, or whose falsification would have serious consequences.
AB - [Context and motivation] Dynamically adaptive systems are increasingly conceived as a means to allow operation in changeable or poorly understood environments. [Question/problem] This can result in the selection of solution strategies based on assumptions that may not be well founded. [Principle ideas/results] This paper proposes the use of claims in goal models as a means to reason about likely sources of uncertainty in dynamically adaptive systems. Accepting that such claims can’t be easily validated at design-time, we should instead evaluate how the system will behave if a claim is proven false by developing a validation scenario. [Contribution] Validation scenarios may be costly to evaluate so the approach we advocate is designed to carefully select only those claims that are less certain, or whose falsification would have serious consequences.
KW - self adaptation
KW - dynamically adaptive system
KW - goal models
KW - uncertainty
KW - claims
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-14192-8_2
DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-14192-8_2
M3 - Conference contribution/Paper
SN - 978-3-642-14191-1
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science
SP - 2
EP - 16
BT - Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality 16th International Working Conference, REFSQ 2010, Essen, Germany, June 30–July 2, 2010. Proceedings
A2 - Wieringa, Roel
A2 - Persson, Anne
PB - Springer
CY - Berlin
T2 - Requirements Engineering Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ) 2010
Y2 - 30 June 2010 through 2 July 2010
ER -
