Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > (Un)folding the map of early modern Ireland
View graph of relations

(Un)folding the map of early modern Ireland: Spenser, Moryson and Bartlett

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

(Un)folding the map of early modern Ireland: Spenser, Moryson and Bartlett. / Camino, Mercedes.
In: Cartographica, Vol. 34, No. 4, 1997, p. 1-17.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Camino M. (Un)folding the map of early modern Ireland: Spenser, Moryson and Bartlett. Cartographica. 1997;34(4):1-17. doi: 10.3138/1H30-J850-LX2U-G248

Author

Bibtex

@article{dd56c4bbdbf94626923c035cd32bacbf,
title = "(Un)folding the map of early modern Ireland: Spenser, Moryson and Bartlett",
abstract = "This paper departs from the assumption that Spenser's View of the Present State of Ireland and other contemporary works related to the conquest and colonization or to Ireland, including Fynes Moryson's Itinerary and Richard Bartlett's bird's-eye views, map the secrets of the Irish land and its peoples so as to facilitate and stimulate their conquest. Moryson's and Spenser's texts, like Bartlett's views and the frontispiece of Ortelius's Theatrum, can be read as cartographic narratives to be folded and unfolded in a process of discovery and possession designed to implicate readers and viewers. They can thus be classed, using Tom Conley's formulation, as {"}cartographic writings{"} that exploit the geographical overtones of their titles, and rely on a particular way of seeing, the aim of which is to own, subject, and control. However different, these written and visual representations foreground the prominence of the eye/I in the processes of conquest and domination. Travel narrative, dialogue, and map, that is, become interchangeable weapons in a destructive visual and discursive unveiling of cultural and geographical {"}secrets.{"}",
author = "Mercedes Camino",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.3138/1H30-J850-LX2U-G248",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "1--17",
journal = "Cartographica",
issn = "1911-9925",
publisher = "University of Toronto Press",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - (Un)folding the map of early modern Ireland

T2 - Spenser, Moryson and Bartlett

AU - Camino, Mercedes

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - This paper departs from the assumption that Spenser's View of the Present State of Ireland and other contemporary works related to the conquest and colonization or to Ireland, including Fynes Moryson's Itinerary and Richard Bartlett's bird's-eye views, map the secrets of the Irish land and its peoples so as to facilitate and stimulate their conquest. Moryson's and Spenser's texts, like Bartlett's views and the frontispiece of Ortelius's Theatrum, can be read as cartographic narratives to be folded and unfolded in a process of discovery and possession designed to implicate readers and viewers. They can thus be classed, using Tom Conley's formulation, as "cartographic writings" that exploit the geographical overtones of their titles, and rely on a particular way of seeing, the aim of which is to own, subject, and control. However different, these written and visual representations foreground the prominence of the eye/I in the processes of conquest and domination. Travel narrative, dialogue, and map, that is, become interchangeable weapons in a destructive visual and discursive unveiling of cultural and geographical "secrets."

AB - This paper departs from the assumption that Spenser's View of the Present State of Ireland and other contemporary works related to the conquest and colonization or to Ireland, including Fynes Moryson's Itinerary and Richard Bartlett's bird's-eye views, map the secrets of the Irish land and its peoples so as to facilitate and stimulate their conquest. Moryson's and Spenser's texts, like Bartlett's views and the frontispiece of Ortelius's Theatrum, can be read as cartographic narratives to be folded and unfolded in a process of discovery and possession designed to implicate readers and viewers. They can thus be classed, using Tom Conley's formulation, as "cartographic writings" that exploit the geographical overtones of their titles, and rely on a particular way of seeing, the aim of which is to own, subject, and control. However different, these written and visual representations foreground the prominence of the eye/I in the processes of conquest and domination. Travel narrative, dialogue, and map, that is, become interchangeable weapons in a destructive visual and discursive unveiling of cultural and geographical "secrets."

U2 - 10.3138/1H30-J850-LX2U-G248

DO - 10.3138/1H30-J850-LX2U-G248

M3 - Journal article

VL - 34

SP - 1

EP - 17

JO - Cartographica

JF - Cartographica

SN - 1911-9925

IS - 4

ER -