Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Universities and economic development activities

Electronic data

  • Transition

    Rights statement: COPYRIGHT 2012 IP PUBLISHING LTD.

    Final published version, 262 KB, PDF document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Universities and economic development activities: a UK regional comparison

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Universities and economic development activities: a UK regional comparison. / Decter, M; Cave, F D; Rose, M B et al.
In: Industry and Higher Education, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2011, p. 359-374.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Decter M, Cave FD, Rose MB, Peers G, Fogg H, Smith SM. Universities and economic development activities: a UK regional comparison. Industry and Higher Education. 2011;25(5):359-374. doi: 10.5367/ihe.2011.0058

Author

Decter, M ; Cave, F D ; Rose, M B et al. / Universities and economic development activities : a UK regional comparison. In: Industry and Higher Education. 2011 ; Vol. 25, No. 5. pp. 359-374.

Bibtex

@article{20d5cbf6a7314fcf817e3dacef22d3c6,
title = "Universities and economic development activities: a UK regional comparison",
abstract = "A number of UK universities prioritize economic development or regeneration activities and for some of these universities such activities are the main focus of their knowledge transfer work. This study compares two regions of the UK - the North West and the South East of England - which have very different levels of economic performance. Quantitative data from the UK government's Higher Education Business and Community Interaction Survey are used to track economic development funding and activity from universities in these two regions. Strategy documents prepared for the fourth round of the government's Higher Education Innovation Fund are analysed to aid interpretations. Elements of evolutionary theory are used to explore the reasons for the differences and a case study of one university programme, Leading Enterprise and Development, is provided as an illustrative example.",
keywords = "knowledge transfer, economic development, regeneration, UK",
author = "M Decter and Cave, {F D} and Rose, {M B} and G Peers and H Fogg and Smith, {S M}",
note = "COPYRIGHT 2012 IP PUBLISHING LTD.",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.5367/ihe.2011.0058",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "359--374",
journal = "Industry and Higher Education",
issn = "0950-4222",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Universities and economic development activities

T2 - a UK regional comparison

AU - Decter, M

AU - Cave, F D

AU - Rose, M B

AU - Peers, G

AU - Fogg, H

AU - Smith, S M

N1 - COPYRIGHT 2012 IP PUBLISHING LTD.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - A number of UK universities prioritize economic development or regeneration activities and for some of these universities such activities are the main focus of their knowledge transfer work. This study compares two regions of the UK - the North West and the South East of England - which have very different levels of economic performance. Quantitative data from the UK government's Higher Education Business and Community Interaction Survey are used to track economic development funding and activity from universities in these two regions. Strategy documents prepared for the fourth round of the government's Higher Education Innovation Fund are analysed to aid interpretations. Elements of evolutionary theory are used to explore the reasons for the differences and a case study of one university programme, Leading Enterprise and Development, is provided as an illustrative example.

AB - A number of UK universities prioritize economic development or regeneration activities and for some of these universities such activities are the main focus of their knowledge transfer work. This study compares two regions of the UK - the North West and the South East of England - which have very different levels of economic performance. Quantitative data from the UK government's Higher Education Business and Community Interaction Survey are used to track economic development funding and activity from universities in these two regions. Strategy documents prepared for the fourth round of the government's Higher Education Innovation Fund are analysed to aid interpretations. Elements of evolutionary theory are used to explore the reasons for the differences and a case study of one university programme, Leading Enterprise and Development, is provided as an illustrative example.

KW - knowledge transfer

KW - economic development

KW - regeneration

KW - UK

U2 - 10.5367/ihe.2011.0058

DO - 10.5367/ihe.2011.0058

M3 - Journal article

VL - 25

SP - 359

EP - 374

JO - Industry and Higher Education

JF - Industry and Higher Education

SN - 0950-4222

IS - 5

ER -