Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Use of geometry for spatial reorientation in ch...
View graph of relations

Use of geometry for spatial reorientation in children applies only to symmetrical spaces.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Use of geometry for spatial reorientation in children applies only to symmetrical spaces. / Lew, Adina R.; Gibbons, Bryony; Murphy, Caroline et al.
In: Developmental Science, Vol. 13, No. 3, 05.2010, p. 490-498.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Lew AR, Gibbons B, Murphy C, Bremner JG. Use of geometry for spatial reorientation in children applies only to symmetrical spaces. Developmental Science. 2010 May;13(3):490-498. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00904.x

Author

Lew, Adina R. ; Gibbons, Bryony ; Murphy, Caroline et al. / Use of geometry for spatial reorientation in children applies only to symmetrical spaces. In: Developmental Science. 2010 ; Vol. 13, No. 3. pp. 490-498.

Bibtex

@article{1e1b1a55c31f4dc7aae35c4d07058479,
title = "Use of geometry for spatial reorientation in children applies only to symmetrical spaces.",
abstract = "Proponents of the geometric module hypothesis argue that following disorientation, many species reorient by use of macro-environment geometry. It is suggested that attention to the surface layout geometry of natural terrain features may have been selected for over evolutionary time due to the enduring and unambiguous location information it provides. Paradoxically, however, tests of the hypothesis have been exclusively conducted in symmetric (hence 'unnatural' and geometrically ambiguous) environments. The present series of studies examines reorientation by 18-month-3-year-old children in a rectangular versus irregular quadrilateral enclosure (Study 1), a rectangular versus irregular quadrilateral array (Study 2) and an isosceles versus irregular triangular array (Study 3). Children were successful in symmetric but not asymmetric environments, casting doubt on the functional argument for an empirical basis of the geometric module hypothesis.",
keywords = "ENCLOSED SPACES, ENVIRONMENT, RATS, INFORMATION, MODULE, SHAPE, REPRESENTATION, NAVIGATION, LANDMARKS, TASKS",
author = "Lew, {Adina R.} and Bryony Gibbons and Caroline Murphy and Bremner, {J. Gavin}",
year = "2010",
month = may,
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00904.x",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "490--498",
journal = "Developmental Science",
issn = "1363-755X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of geometry for spatial reorientation in children applies only to symmetrical spaces.

AU - Lew, Adina R.

AU - Gibbons, Bryony

AU - Murphy, Caroline

AU - Bremner, J. Gavin

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - Proponents of the geometric module hypothesis argue that following disorientation, many species reorient by use of macro-environment geometry. It is suggested that attention to the surface layout geometry of natural terrain features may have been selected for over evolutionary time due to the enduring and unambiguous location information it provides. Paradoxically, however, tests of the hypothesis have been exclusively conducted in symmetric (hence 'unnatural' and geometrically ambiguous) environments. The present series of studies examines reorientation by 18-month-3-year-old children in a rectangular versus irregular quadrilateral enclosure (Study 1), a rectangular versus irregular quadrilateral array (Study 2) and an isosceles versus irregular triangular array (Study 3). Children were successful in symmetric but not asymmetric environments, casting doubt on the functional argument for an empirical basis of the geometric module hypothesis.

AB - Proponents of the geometric module hypothesis argue that following disorientation, many species reorient by use of macro-environment geometry. It is suggested that attention to the surface layout geometry of natural terrain features may have been selected for over evolutionary time due to the enduring and unambiguous location information it provides. Paradoxically, however, tests of the hypothesis have been exclusively conducted in symmetric (hence 'unnatural' and geometrically ambiguous) environments. The present series of studies examines reorientation by 18-month-3-year-old children in a rectangular versus irregular quadrilateral enclosure (Study 1), a rectangular versus irregular quadrilateral array (Study 2) and an isosceles versus irregular triangular array (Study 3). Children were successful in symmetric but not asymmetric environments, casting doubt on the functional argument for an empirical basis of the geometric module hypothesis.

KW - ENCLOSED SPACES

KW - ENVIRONMENT

KW - RATS

KW - INFORMATION

KW - MODULE

KW - SHAPE

KW - REPRESENTATION

KW - NAVIGATION

KW - LANDMARKS

KW - TASKS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952726094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00904.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00904.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 13

SP - 490

EP - 498

JO - Developmental Science

JF - Developmental Science

SN - 1363-755X

IS - 3

ER -