Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Victorian Literature and the Variety of Religio...

Electronic data

  • Forms_of_Religion_essay_v2

    Accepted author manuscript, 276 KB, PDF-document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Victorian Literature and the Variety of Religious Forms

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Victorian Literature and the Variety of Religious Forms. / Knight, Mark James.

In: Victorian Literature and Culture, Vol. 46, No. 2, 06.2018, p. 517-529.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

Knight, MJ 2018, 'Victorian Literature and the Variety of Religious Forms' Victorian Literature and Culture, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 517-529. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1060150318000116

APA

Vancouver

Author

Knight, Mark James. / Victorian Literature and the Variety of Religious Forms. In: Victorian Literature and Culture. 2018 ; Vol. 46, No. 2. pp. 517-529.

Bibtex

@article{085ec6a147af4a748ee48f068041543c,
title = "Victorian Literature and the Variety of Religious Forms",
abstract = "Literary studies is not the only discipline to show a new enthusiasm for religion in the opening decades of the twenty-first century. When Stanley Fish suggested back in 2005 that religion might become the new theoretical center of gravity in the humanities, his declaration was cited frequently and may have proved a little too convenient for those, like myself, who wanted to see a major theoretical realignment in the humanities’ attitude to religion. But, the reality is that Fish is just one of a number of other prominent theorists in the last twenty years or so to have shown a new appreciation for the theoretical resources that religious thought makes available. Although the term religion is understood very differently across thinkers such as Giorgio Agamben, Judith Butler, Jacques Derrida, Bruno Latour, Sabo Mahmood, Charles Taylor, and Slavoj Žižek, they share a refusal to accept crude notions of the secularization thesis, with its commitment to seeing religion as an irrelevance in the modern world, and are instead determined to see religion as more than just an antiquated ideology that needs to be unmasked.",
author = "Knight, {Mark James}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1017/S1060150318000116",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "517--529",
journal = "Victorian Literature and Culture",
issn = "1060-1503",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Victorian Literature and the Variety of Religious Forms

AU - Knight, Mark James

PY - 2018/6

Y1 - 2018/6

N2 - Literary studies is not the only discipline to show a new enthusiasm for religion in the opening decades of the twenty-first century. When Stanley Fish suggested back in 2005 that religion might become the new theoretical center of gravity in the humanities, his declaration was cited frequently and may have proved a little too convenient for those, like myself, who wanted to see a major theoretical realignment in the humanities’ attitude to religion. But, the reality is that Fish is just one of a number of other prominent theorists in the last twenty years or so to have shown a new appreciation for the theoretical resources that religious thought makes available. Although the term religion is understood very differently across thinkers such as Giorgio Agamben, Judith Butler, Jacques Derrida, Bruno Latour, Sabo Mahmood, Charles Taylor, and Slavoj Žižek, they share a refusal to accept crude notions of the secularization thesis, with its commitment to seeing religion as an irrelevance in the modern world, and are instead determined to see religion as more than just an antiquated ideology that needs to be unmasked.

AB - Literary studies is not the only discipline to show a new enthusiasm for religion in the opening decades of the twenty-first century. When Stanley Fish suggested back in 2005 that religion might become the new theoretical center of gravity in the humanities, his declaration was cited frequently and may have proved a little too convenient for those, like myself, who wanted to see a major theoretical realignment in the humanities’ attitude to religion. But, the reality is that Fish is just one of a number of other prominent theorists in the last twenty years or so to have shown a new appreciation for the theoretical resources that religious thought makes available. Although the term religion is understood very differently across thinkers such as Giorgio Agamben, Judith Butler, Jacques Derrida, Bruno Latour, Sabo Mahmood, Charles Taylor, and Slavoj Žižek, they share a refusal to accept crude notions of the secularization thesis, with its commitment to seeing religion as an irrelevance in the modern world, and are instead determined to see religion as more than just an antiquated ideology that needs to be unmasked.

U2 - 10.1017/S1060150318000116

DO - 10.1017/S1060150318000116

M3 - Journal article

VL - 46

SP - 517

EP - 529

JO - Victorian Literature and Culture

JF - Victorian Literature and Culture

SN - 1060-1503

IS - 2

ER -