Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Viewing patient need through professional writi...
View graph of relations

Viewing patient need through professional writings: a systematic 'ethnographic' review of palliative care professionals' experiences of caring for people with cancer. at the end of life.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Viewing patient need through professional writings: a systematic 'ethnographic' review of palliative care professionals' experiences of caring for people with cancer. at the end of life. / McDermott, E.; Bingley, Amanda F.; Thomas, Carol et al.
In: Progress in Palliative Care, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.2006, p. 9-18.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{89e1647dc72447dcb3c46e7d2ba4a22a,
title = "Viewing patient need through professional writings: a systematic 'ethnographic' review of palliative care professionals' experiences of caring for people with cancer. at the end of life.",
abstract = "Aim: A systematic review of palliative care professionals' written accounts of caring for people with cancer who are knowingly facing death; in order to provide another source of evidence on patients' needs. Methods: Systematic review methodology was utilised to locate published 'reflective narratives' (not original research) written by palliative care professionals from a variety of disciplines and institutional settings, which focused on the experiences of caring for patients with cancer as they approached their death. The search strategy yielded 2224 texts which were reduced to a dataset of 202 after the application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria. A quantitative analysis was conducted on the full data set and a qualitative analysis was performed on a selected sub-sample. Main results: Professionals identify a wide range of needs of people with cancer at the end of life. They write particularly forcefully about: patient autonomy; choice and control; access to information; and full participation in decision-making about patient care. However, closer examination of the texts demonstrates that professionals may also have fixed expectations about: management of patients' emotion; over emphasise choice and control; lack recognition of power in the patient–professional relationship; and tend to homogenise patient needs. Conclusions: The research raises questions about professionals' interpretation of patient needs and suggests that the care received by people with advanced cancer is still firmly framed within biomedical culture and the social organisation of medicine, which struggle to acknowledge individual autonomy and meet the diversity of individual end-of-life needs.",
keywords = "CANCER, PATIENTS, PALLIATIVE, AUTONOMY, DIVERSITY",
author = "E. McDermott and Bingley, {Amanda F.} and Carol Thomas and Sheila Payne and J. Seymour and D. Clark",
note = "RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Social Work and Social Policy & Administration",
year = "2006",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1179/096992606X93362",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "9--18",
journal = "Progress in Palliative Care",
issn = "1743-291X",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Viewing patient need through professional writings: a systematic 'ethnographic' review of palliative care professionals' experiences of caring for people with cancer. at the end of life.

AU - McDermott, E.

AU - Bingley, Amanda F.

AU - Thomas, Carol

AU - Payne, Sheila

AU - Seymour, J.

AU - Clark, D.

N1 - RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Social Work and Social Policy & Administration

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - Aim: A systematic review of palliative care professionals' written accounts of caring for people with cancer who are knowingly facing death; in order to provide another source of evidence on patients' needs. Methods: Systematic review methodology was utilised to locate published 'reflective narratives' (not original research) written by palliative care professionals from a variety of disciplines and institutional settings, which focused on the experiences of caring for patients with cancer as they approached their death. The search strategy yielded 2224 texts which were reduced to a dataset of 202 after the application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria. A quantitative analysis was conducted on the full data set and a qualitative analysis was performed on a selected sub-sample. Main results: Professionals identify a wide range of needs of people with cancer at the end of life. They write particularly forcefully about: patient autonomy; choice and control; access to information; and full participation in decision-making about patient care. However, closer examination of the texts demonstrates that professionals may also have fixed expectations about: management of patients' emotion; over emphasise choice and control; lack recognition of power in the patient–professional relationship; and tend to homogenise patient needs. Conclusions: The research raises questions about professionals' interpretation of patient needs and suggests that the care received by people with advanced cancer is still firmly framed within biomedical culture and the social organisation of medicine, which struggle to acknowledge individual autonomy and meet the diversity of individual end-of-life needs.

AB - Aim: A systematic review of palliative care professionals' written accounts of caring for people with cancer who are knowingly facing death; in order to provide another source of evidence on patients' needs. Methods: Systematic review methodology was utilised to locate published 'reflective narratives' (not original research) written by palliative care professionals from a variety of disciplines and institutional settings, which focused on the experiences of caring for patients with cancer as they approached their death. The search strategy yielded 2224 texts which were reduced to a dataset of 202 after the application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria. A quantitative analysis was conducted on the full data set and a qualitative analysis was performed on a selected sub-sample. Main results: Professionals identify a wide range of needs of people with cancer at the end of life. They write particularly forcefully about: patient autonomy; choice and control; access to information; and full participation in decision-making about patient care. However, closer examination of the texts demonstrates that professionals may also have fixed expectations about: management of patients' emotion; over emphasise choice and control; lack recognition of power in the patient–professional relationship; and tend to homogenise patient needs. Conclusions: The research raises questions about professionals' interpretation of patient needs and suggests that the care received by people with advanced cancer is still firmly framed within biomedical culture and the social organisation of medicine, which struggle to acknowledge individual autonomy and meet the diversity of individual end-of-life needs.

KW - CANCER

KW - PATIENTS

KW - PALLIATIVE

KW - AUTONOMY

KW - DIVERSITY

U2 - 10.1179/096992606X93362

DO - 10.1179/096992606X93362

M3 - Journal article

VL - 14

SP - 9

EP - 18

JO - Progress in Palliative Care

JF - Progress in Palliative Care

SN - 1743-291X

IS - 1

ER -