Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > What managerialists forget
View graph of relations

What managerialists forget: higher education credit frameworks and managerialist ideology

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

What managerialists forget: higher education credit frameworks and managerialist ideology. / Trowler, Paul.
In: International Studies in Sociology of Education, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1998, p. 91-110.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Trowler P. What managerialists forget: higher education credit frameworks and managerialist ideology. International Studies in Sociology of Education. 1998;8(1):91-110. doi: 10.1080/0962021980020020

Author

Trowler, Paul. / What managerialists forget : higher education credit frameworks and managerialist ideology. In: International Studies in Sociology of Education. 1998 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 91-110.

Bibtex

@article{2f1fa1d7079545b98ddb221e8d0c405c,
title = "What managerialists forget: higher education credit frameworks and managerialist ideology",
abstract = "This article uses data from a five-year ethnographic study of a single higher education institution to assess aspects of the 'realism' of managerialist approaches articulated through the credit framework in higher education in the United Kingdom. By 'credit framework' is meant the constellation of more or less compatible features facilitated by the assignment of credit to assessed learning, including modularity, the semester system, franchising, the accreditation of work-based learning and of prior learning. From the perspective of managerialist ideology the framework as a whole and its individual components offer a number of attractions, including greater economy, efficiency, manageability and market responsiveness in higher education institutions. Data from the site of the study and a theoretical framework derived from policy sociology are used to show that managerialist ideology oversimplifies and occludes aspects of social reality in higher education, the effect of which is to undermine many of the benefits claimed for the credit framework by managerialists.",
keywords = "Higher education",
author = "Paul Trowler",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1080/0962021980020020",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "91--110",
journal = "International Studies in Sociology of Education",
issn = "1747-5066",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What managerialists forget

T2 - higher education credit frameworks and managerialist ideology

AU - Trowler, Paul

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - This article uses data from a five-year ethnographic study of a single higher education institution to assess aspects of the 'realism' of managerialist approaches articulated through the credit framework in higher education in the United Kingdom. By 'credit framework' is meant the constellation of more or less compatible features facilitated by the assignment of credit to assessed learning, including modularity, the semester system, franchising, the accreditation of work-based learning and of prior learning. From the perspective of managerialist ideology the framework as a whole and its individual components offer a number of attractions, including greater economy, efficiency, manageability and market responsiveness in higher education institutions. Data from the site of the study and a theoretical framework derived from policy sociology are used to show that managerialist ideology oversimplifies and occludes aspects of social reality in higher education, the effect of which is to undermine many of the benefits claimed for the credit framework by managerialists.

AB - This article uses data from a five-year ethnographic study of a single higher education institution to assess aspects of the 'realism' of managerialist approaches articulated through the credit framework in higher education in the United Kingdom. By 'credit framework' is meant the constellation of more or less compatible features facilitated by the assignment of credit to assessed learning, including modularity, the semester system, franchising, the accreditation of work-based learning and of prior learning. From the perspective of managerialist ideology the framework as a whole and its individual components offer a number of attractions, including greater economy, efficiency, manageability and market responsiveness in higher education institutions. Data from the site of the study and a theoretical framework derived from policy sociology are used to show that managerialist ideology oversimplifies and occludes aspects of social reality in higher education, the effect of which is to undermine many of the benefits claimed for the credit framework by managerialists.

KW - Higher education

U2 - 10.1080/0962021980020020

DO - 10.1080/0962021980020020

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

SP - 91

EP - 110

JO - International Studies in Sociology of Education

JF - International Studies in Sociology of Education

SN - 1747-5066

IS - 1

ER -