Rights statement: This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Medical Law Review following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Sara Fovargue and Rebecca Bennett WHAT ROLE SHOULD PUBLIC OPINION PLAY IN ETHICO-LEGAL DECISION MAKING? THE EXAMPLE OF SELECTING SEX FOR NON-MEDICAL REASONS USING PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS Med Law Rev (Winter 2016) 24 (1): 34-58 is available online at: http://medlaw.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/1/34
Accepted author manuscript, 216 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - What role should public opinion play in ethico-legal decision making?
T2 - the example of selecting sex for non-medical reasons using preimplantation genetic diagnosis
AU - Fovargue, Sara Jane
AU - Bennett, Rebecca
N1 - This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Medical Law Review following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Sara Fovargue and Rebecca Bennett WHAT ROLE SHOULD PUBLIC OPINION PLAY IN ETHICO-LEGAL DECISION MAKING? THE EXAMPLE OF SELECTING SEX FOR NON-MEDICAL REASONS USING PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS Med Law Rev (Winter 2016) 24 (1): 34-58 is available online at: http://medlaw.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/1/34
PY - 2016/2/1
Y1 - 2016/2/1
N2 - In this article we consider the prohibition on the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis toselect an embryo on the basis of its sex for non-medical reasons. We use this as a case studyto explore the role that public consultations have and should play in ethico-legal decision making. Until the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 was amended by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, non-medical sex selection of an embryo was not statutorily regulated but it was the policy of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority that such selection should not occur. However, since 2009 it has been a criminal offence to select an embryo on the basis of its sex for non-medical reasons. We consider the reasons given for this change and explore the role that ‘public opinion’ had in the decision making process. On the face of it, asking the public what they think seems reasonable, fair and democratic, and those who are not in favour of public consultations being accorded great weight in matters of policy may appear out of touch and as wanting to impose their moral views on the public at large. But there are problems with doing so, especially when seeking to regulate ethically controversial issues. We discuss whether regulation should be influenced by public opinion obtained via ‘public consultations’, and utilise sex selection for non-medical reasons as an example of how (apparently) public opinion was used to support the criminalisation of this practice.
AB - In this article we consider the prohibition on the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis toselect an embryo on the basis of its sex for non-medical reasons. We use this as a case studyto explore the role that public consultations have and should play in ethico-legal decision making. Until the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 was amended by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, non-medical sex selection of an embryo was not statutorily regulated but it was the policy of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority that such selection should not occur. However, since 2009 it has been a criminal offence to select an embryo on the basis of its sex for non-medical reasons. We consider the reasons given for this change and explore the role that ‘public opinion’ had in the decision making process. On the face of it, asking the public what they think seems reasonable, fair and democratic, and those who are not in favour of public consultations being accorded great weight in matters of policy may appear out of touch and as wanting to impose their moral views on the public at large. But there are problems with doing so, especially when seeking to regulate ethically controversial issues. We discuss whether regulation should be influenced by public opinion obtained via ‘public consultations’, and utilise sex selection for non-medical reasons as an example of how (apparently) public opinion was used to support the criminalisation of this practice.
KW - criminalisation
KW - harm principle
KW - preimplantation genetic diagnosis
KW - public opinion
KW - sex selection
KW - welfare of the child
U2 - 10.1093/medlaw/fwv046
DO - 10.1093/medlaw/fwv046
M3 - Journal article
VL - 24
SP - 34
EP - 58
JO - Medical Law Review
JF - Medical Law Review
SN - 0967-0742
IS - 1
ER -