Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Why do people file share unlawfully?

Electronic data

  • 1-s2.0-S0747563217300869-main

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Computers in Human Behavior. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.014

    Accepted author manuscript, 770 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Why do people file share unlawfully?: a systematic review, meta-analysis and panel study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
  • Piers Fleming
  • Steven J. Watson
  • Elisavet Patouris
  • Kimberley J. Bartholomew
  • Daniel J. Zizzo
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>07/2017
<mark>Journal</mark>Computers in Human Behavior
Volume72
Number of pages14
Pages (from-to)535-548
Publication statusPublished
Early online date5/02/17
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Abstract Unlawful digital media sharing is common and believed to be extremely damaging to business. Understanding unlawful file sharers' motivations offers the opportunity to develop business models and behavioral interventions to maximize consumers' and businesses’ benefit. This paper uses a systematic review of unlawful file sharing research, and the Theory of Planned Behavior, to motivate a large-scale panel study in which initial determinants were used to predict subsequent behavior. A meta-analysis found Attitudes, Subjective Norms and Perceived Behavioral Control were all associated with unlawful file sharing. Media type and demographic differences in the importance of Perceived Behavioral Control were found and attributed to more accurate evaluation of familiar activities, i.e., greater experience increases the influence of Perceived Behavioral Control but age does not. The panel study confirmed that greater past experience was associated with Perceived Behavioral Control and Intention. We conclude that past experience increases the efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behavior and specifically Perceived Behavioral control in predicting behavior, contrary to some widely held beliefs about the role of experience. The role of experience is therefore crucial to understanding people's choices. Practically, improving social approval, positive evaluation and access to lawful media should reduce unlawful behavior.

Bibliographic note

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Computers in Human Behavior. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.014