Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Why Strict Drug Laws Work (And Why They Do Not)

Keywords

View graph of relations

Why Strict Drug Laws Work (And Why They Do Not)

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineEditorial

Published

Standard

Why Strict Drug Laws Work (And Why They Do Not). / Hickman, Timothy.
In: Amsterdam Law Forum, Vol. 2, No. 4, 10.2010.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineEditorial

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Hickman T. Why Strict Drug Laws Work (And Why They Do Not). Amsterdam Law Forum. 2010 Oct;2(4).

Author

Hickman, Timothy. / Why Strict Drug Laws Work (And Why They Do Not). In: Amsterdam Law Forum. 2010 ; Vol. 2, No. 4.

Bibtex

@article{a04353a300dd49ca86990c847b1db7fa,
title = "Why Strict Drug Laws Work (And Why They Do Not)",
abstract = "Academic and scientific arguments in favour of the de-regulation of illicit drugs are usually made on the basis of the greater harm done by the laws than by the drugs themselves. This article argues that such claims miss a key point. They forget that drug policy is made for people from wealthy countries who do not and are not likely to take drugs. As such, arguments based on failed treatment programmes or on large-scale, organised drug crime often fall on the deaf ears of those who believe that strict drug laws help to keep them, and especially their children, off drugs. Advocates of drug de-regulation must take the interests and beliefs of this voting majority seriously if they wish to persuade politicians to ease their {\textquoteleft}war on drugs{\textquoteright}.",
keywords = "Drug laws",
author = "Timothy Hickman",
year = "2010",
month = oct,
language = "English",
volume = "2",
journal = "Amsterdam Law Forum",
issn = "1876-8156",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why Strict Drug Laws Work (And Why They Do Not)

AU - Hickman, Timothy

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - Academic and scientific arguments in favour of the de-regulation of illicit drugs are usually made on the basis of the greater harm done by the laws than by the drugs themselves. This article argues that such claims miss a key point. They forget that drug policy is made for people from wealthy countries who do not and are not likely to take drugs. As such, arguments based on failed treatment programmes or on large-scale, organised drug crime often fall on the deaf ears of those who believe that strict drug laws help to keep them, and especially their children, off drugs. Advocates of drug de-regulation must take the interests and beliefs of this voting majority seriously if they wish to persuade politicians to ease their ‘war on drugs’.

AB - Academic and scientific arguments in favour of the de-regulation of illicit drugs are usually made on the basis of the greater harm done by the laws than by the drugs themselves. This article argues that such claims miss a key point. They forget that drug policy is made for people from wealthy countries who do not and are not likely to take drugs. As such, arguments based on failed treatment programmes or on large-scale, organised drug crime often fall on the deaf ears of those who believe that strict drug laws help to keep them, and especially their children, off drugs. Advocates of drug de-regulation must take the interests and beliefs of this voting majority seriously if they wish to persuade politicians to ease their ‘war on drugs’.

KW - Drug laws

M3 - Editorial

VL - 2

JO - Amsterdam Law Forum

JF - Amsterdam Law Forum

SN - 1876-8156

IS - 4

ER -