Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Widespread inconsistency in estimation of lake ...

Electronic data

  • Gray_etal_WR_Manuscript_290819 for Pure

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Water Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Water Research, 168, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115136

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.02 MB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 3/10/20

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Widespread inconsistency in estimation of lake mixed depth impacts interpretation of limnological processes

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
Close
Article number115136
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/01/2020
<mark>Journal</mark>Water Research
Volume168
Number of pages10
Publication statusPublished
Early online date3/10/19
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

The mixed layer, or epilimnion, is a physical concept referring to an isothermal layer at the surface of a water body. This concept is ubiquitous within limnology, is fundamental to our understanding of chemical and ecological processes, and is an important metric for water body monitoring, assessment and management. Despite its importance as a metric, many different approaches to approximating mixed depth currently exist. Using data from field campaigns in a small meso-eutrophic lake in the UK in 2016 and 2017 we tested whether different definitions of mixed depth resulted in comparable estimates and whether variables other than temperature could be assumed to be mixed within the layer. Different methods resulted in very different estimates for the mixed depth and ecologically important variables were not necessarily homogenously spread through the epilimnion. Furthermore, calculation of simple ecologically relevant metrics based on mixed depth showed that these metrics were highly dependent on the definition of mixed depth used. The results demonstrate that an idealised concept of a well-defined fully mixed layer is not necessarily appropriate. The widespread use of multiple definitions for mixed depth impairs the comparability of different studies while associated uncertainty over the most appropriate definition limits the confirmability of studies utilising the mixed depths.

Bibliographic note

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Water Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Water Research, 168, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115136