Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Working memory and the observed effectiveness o...
View graph of relations

Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. / Révész, Andrea.
In: Language Learning, Vol. 62, No. 1, 03.2012, p. 93-132.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Révész A. Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning. 2012 Mar;62(1):93-132. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00690.x

Author

Bibtex

@article{0a3d8ade9e4a44269bdcac707659b101,
title = "Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures.",
abstract = "This study examined whether the observed effectiveness of recasts is influenced by the type of outcome measure used, and whether different aspects of working memory are differentially associated with learners{\textquoteright} performance on the various outcome measures. The participants were 90 EFL learners, who were randomly assigned to a recast, a nonrecast, and a control group. A pretest-posttest-delayed posttest design was employed to detect any improvement in the learners{\textquoteright} knowledge of one usage of the English past progressive construction. Many-facet Rasch measurement and correlational analyses yielded two main findings. First, recasts generated the greatest gains on an oral production test, lesser gains on a written production test, and the least gains on a written grammaticality judgement test. Second, in the recast group, participants with higher reading-spans achieved more development on the written tests, while those with higher digit and non-word spans showed greater improvement on the oral test. For the nonrecast group, no association was found between the working memory and developmental measures.",
keywords = "recasts, working memory , negative feedback , phonological short-term memory , executive control , procedural knowledge , declarative knowledge",
author = "Andrea R{\'e}v{\'e}sz",
year = "2012",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00690.x",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "93--132",
journal = "Language Learning",
issn = "0023-8333",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures.

AU - Révész, Andrea

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - This study examined whether the observed effectiveness of recasts is influenced by the type of outcome measure used, and whether different aspects of working memory are differentially associated with learners’ performance on the various outcome measures. The participants were 90 EFL learners, who were randomly assigned to a recast, a nonrecast, and a control group. A pretest-posttest-delayed posttest design was employed to detect any improvement in the learners’ knowledge of one usage of the English past progressive construction. Many-facet Rasch measurement and correlational analyses yielded two main findings. First, recasts generated the greatest gains on an oral production test, lesser gains on a written production test, and the least gains on a written grammaticality judgement test. Second, in the recast group, participants with higher reading-spans achieved more development on the written tests, while those with higher digit and non-word spans showed greater improvement on the oral test. For the nonrecast group, no association was found between the working memory and developmental measures.

AB - This study examined whether the observed effectiveness of recasts is influenced by the type of outcome measure used, and whether different aspects of working memory are differentially associated with learners’ performance on the various outcome measures. The participants were 90 EFL learners, who were randomly assigned to a recast, a nonrecast, and a control group. A pretest-posttest-delayed posttest design was employed to detect any improvement in the learners’ knowledge of one usage of the English past progressive construction. Many-facet Rasch measurement and correlational analyses yielded two main findings. First, recasts generated the greatest gains on an oral production test, lesser gains on a written production test, and the least gains on a written grammaticality judgement test. Second, in the recast group, participants with higher reading-spans achieved more development on the written tests, while those with higher digit and non-word spans showed greater improvement on the oral test. For the nonrecast group, no association was found between the working memory and developmental measures.

KW - recasts

KW - working memory

KW - negative feedback

KW - phonological short-term memory

KW - executive control

KW - procedural knowledge

KW - declarative knowledge

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00690.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00690.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 62

SP - 93

EP - 132

JO - Language Learning

JF - Language Learning

SN - 0023-8333

IS - 1

ER -