Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Workload control and order release in two-level...
View graph of relations

Workload control and order release in two-level multi-stage job shops: an assessment by simulation

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Workload control and order release in two-level multi-stage job shops: an assessment by simulation. / Thurer, Matthias; Stevenson, Mark; Silva, Cristovao et al.
In: International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 51, No. 3, 02.2013, p. 869-882.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Thurer, M, Stevenson, M, Silva, C, Land, M & Filho, M 2013, 'Workload control and order release in two-level multi-stage job shops: an assessment by simulation', International Journal of Production Research, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 869-882. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.676685

APA

Thurer, M., Stevenson, M., Silva, C., Land, M., & Filho, M. (2013). Workload control and order release in two-level multi-stage job shops: an assessment by simulation. International Journal of Production Research, 51(3), 869-882. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.676685

Vancouver

Thurer M, Stevenson M, Silva C, Land M, Filho M. Workload control and order release in two-level multi-stage job shops: an assessment by simulation. International Journal of Production Research. 2013 Feb;51(3):869-882. Epub 2012 Apr 24. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2012.676685

Author

Thurer, Matthias ; Stevenson, Mark ; Silva, Cristovao et al. / Workload control and order release in two-level multi-stage job shops : an assessment by simulation. In: International Journal of Production Research. 2013 ; Vol. 51, No. 3. pp. 869-882.

Bibtex

@article{8bfea9479ba449abad45876d35d5f1d5,
title = "Workload control and order release in two-level multi-stage job shops: an assessment by simulation",
abstract = "Most studies on the performance of workload control (WLC) order release methods assume products have simple structures. But, in practice, products are often complex and consist of a number of sub-assemblies that flow through a {\textquoteleft}level 1{\textquoteright} job shop before converging on several final assembly operations in a {\textquoteleft}level 2{\textquoteright} assembly shop. Evaluating the performance of release methods in this context – referred to as the {\textquoteleft}two-level multi-stage job shop{\textquoteright} – is an important step towards improving the alignment between WLC theory and practice. We use simulation to assess the performance of four of the best-performing WLC order release methods. Results suggest that WLC order release has the potential to limit work-in-process (WIP) while reducing the percentage of tardy jobs. It is also important to consider when and where release should be controlled. Results suggest that: (1) orders should be considered for release to level 2 when the first sub-assembly is complete, rather than only when all of the sub-assemblies that make up an assembly order are complete at level 1; and, (2) exercising control at level 2 (with or without control at level 1) leads to a greater reduction in the percentage of tardy jobs than control at level 1 only.",
keywords = "controlled order release, multi-stage job shop , workload control (WLC) , simulation",
author = "Matthias Thurer and Mark Stevenson and Cristovao Silva and Martin Land and Moacir Filho",
year = "2013",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1080/00207543.2012.676685",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "869--882",
journal = "International Journal of Production Research",
issn = "0020-7543",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Workload control and order release in two-level multi-stage job shops

T2 - an assessment by simulation

AU - Thurer, Matthias

AU - Stevenson, Mark

AU - Silva, Cristovao

AU - Land, Martin

AU - Filho, Moacir

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Most studies on the performance of workload control (WLC) order release methods assume products have simple structures. But, in practice, products are often complex and consist of a number of sub-assemblies that flow through a ‘level 1’ job shop before converging on several final assembly operations in a ‘level 2’ assembly shop. Evaluating the performance of release methods in this context – referred to as the ‘two-level multi-stage job shop’ – is an important step towards improving the alignment between WLC theory and practice. We use simulation to assess the performance of four of the best-performing WLC order release methods. Results suggest that WLC order release has the potential to limit work-in-process (WIP) while reducing the percentage of tardy jobs. It is also important to consider when and where release should be controlled. Results suggest that: (1) orders should be considered for release to level 2 when the first sub-assembly is complete, rather than only when all of the sub-assemblies that make up an assembly order are complete at level 1; and, (2) exercising control at level 2 (with or without control at level 1) leads to a greater reduction in the percentage of tardy jobs than control at level 1 only.

AB - Most studies on the performance of workload control (WLC) order release methods assume products have simple structures. But, in practice, products are often complex and consist of a number of sub-assemblies that flow through a ‘level 1’ job shop before converging on several final assembly operations in a ‘level 2’ assembly shop. Evaluating the performance of release methods in this context – referred to as the ‘two-level multi-stage job shop’ – is an important step towards improving the alignment between WLC theory and practice. We use simulation to assess the performance of four of the best-performing WLC order release methods. Results suggest that WLC order release has the potential to limit work-in-process (WIP) while reducing the percentage of tardy jobs. It is also important to consider when and where release should be controlled. Results suggest that: (1) orders should be considered for release to level 2 when the first sub-assembly is complete, rather than only when all of the sub-assemblies that make up an assembly order are complete at level 1; and, (2) exercising control at level 2 (with or without control at level 1) leads to a greater reduction in the percentage of tardy jobs than control at level 1 only.

KW - controlled order release

KW - multi-stage job shop

KW - workload control (WLC)

KW - simulation

U2 - 10.1080/00207543.2012.676685

DO - 10.1080/00207543.2012.676685

M3 - Journal article

VL - 51

SP - 869

EP - 882

JO - International Journal of Production Research

JF - International Journal of Production Research

SN - 0020-7543

IS - 3

ER -