Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > You want me to do what?
View graph of relations

You want me to do what?: teach a studio class to seventy students?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal article

Published

Standard

You want me to do what? teach a studio class to seventy students? / Tippett, Joanne; Connelly, Angela; How, Fraser.
In: Journal for Education in the Built Environment, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011, p. 26-53.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal article

Harvard

Tippett, J, Connelly, A & How, F 2011, 'You want me to do what? teach a studio class to seventy students?', Journal for Education in the Built Environment, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 26-53. https://doi.org/10.11120/jebe.2011.06020026

APA

Tippett, J., Connelly, A., & How, F. (2011). You want me to do what? teach a studio class to seventy students? Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 6(2), 26-53. https://doi.org/10.11120/jebe.2011.06020026

Vancouver

Tippett J, Connelly A, How F. You want me to do what? teach a studio class to seventy students? Journal for Education in the Built Environment. 2011;6(2):26-53. doi: 10.11120/jebe.2011.06020026

Author

Tippett, Joanne ; Connelly, Angela ; How, Fraser. / You want me to do what? teach a studio class to seventy students?. In: Journal for Education in the Built Environment. 2011 ; Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 26-53.

Bibtex

@article{6da09f9deabf4ff48338102717f0bf44,
title = "You want me to do what?: teach a studio class to seventy students?",
abstract = "Amidst widespread recognition of the need to enhance the student experience, built environment educators are facing increased pressure on their time and resources for teaching. Studio-based education, in which students apply ideas to a real site, has been seen as key to a well-rounded education in the built environment and planning professions. At the same time, traditional methods require a high degree of tutor time to be spent with students, which is increasingly impractical given resource constraints and increased class sizes.Drawing on research exploring the challenges posed by sustainable development and participatory processes in ecological planning, a core second year studio-based module at The University of Manchester was re-designed so as to meet these challenges.Key elements of the redesign include: use of the hands-on toolkit, Ketso, for creative thinking and synthesis of ideas within and across groups; mapping and layered spatial analysis; simulating aspects of community consultation, without directly contacting the community; effective use of Graduate Teaching Assistant time in giving feedback and assistance to students; and including an individual reflective learning journal as part of the assessment.The innovations trialled in this module enable an interactive studio experience with a high degree of feedback to be created for large classes. Feedback from students has been very positive. The innovations in the module re-design described in this paper jointly won the 2011 Excellence in Teaching Prize of the Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP).",
author = "Joanne Tippett and Angela Connelly and Fraser How",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.11120/jebe.2011.06020026",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "26--53",
journal = "Journal for Education in the Built Environment",
issn = "1747-4205",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - You want me to do what?

T2 - teach a studio class to seventy students?

AU - Tippett, Joanne

AU - Connelly, Angela

AU - How, Fraser

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Amidst widespread recognition of the need to enhance the student experience, built environment educators are facing increased pressure on their time and resources for teaching. Studio-based education, in which students apply ideas to a real site, has been seen as key to a well-rounded education in the built environment and planning professions. At the same time, traditional methods require a high degree of tutor time to be spent with students, which is increasingly impractical given resource constraints and increased class sizes.Drawing on research exploring the challenges posed by sustainable development and participatory processes in ecological planning, a core second year studio-based module at The University of Manchester was re-designed so as to meet these challenges.Key elements of the redesign include: use of the hands-on toolkit, Ketso, for creative thinking and synthesis of ideas within and across groups; mapping and layered spatial analysis; simulating aspects of community consultation, without directly contacting the community; effective use of Graduate Teaching Assistant time in giving feedback and assistance to students; and including an individual reflective learning journal as part of the assessment.The innovations trialled in this module enable an interactive studio experience with a high degree of feedback to be created for large classes. Feedback from students has been very positive. The innovations in the module re-design described in this paper jointly won the 2011 Excellence in Teaching Prize of the Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP).

AB - Amidst widespread recognition of the need to enhance the student experience, built environment educators are facing increased pressure on their time and resources for teaching. Studio-based education, in which students apply ideas to a real site, has been seen as key to a well-rounded education in the built environment and planning professions. At the same time, traditional methods require a high degree of tutor time to be spent with students, which is increasingly impractical given resource constraints and increased class sizes.Drawing on research exploring the challenges posed by sustainable development and participatory processes in ecological planning, a core second year studio-based module at The University of Manchester was re-designed so as to meet these challenges.Key elements of the redesign include: use of the hands-on toolkit, Ketso, for creative thinking and synthesis of ideas within and across groups; mapping and layered spatial analysis; simulating aspects of community consultation, without directly contacting the community; effective use of Graduate Teaching Assistant time in giving feedback and assistance to students; and including an individual reflective learning journal as part of the assessment.The innovations trialled in this module enable an interactive studio experience with a high degree of feedback to be created for large classes. Feedback from students has been very positive. The innovations in the module re-design described in this paper jointly won the 2011 Excellence in Teaching Prize of the Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP).

U2 - 10.11120/jebe.2011.06020026

DO - 10.11120/jebe.2011.06020026

M3 - Journal article

VL - 6

SP - 26

EP - 53

JO - Journal for Education in the Built Environment

JF - Journal for Education in the Built Environment

SN - 1747-4205

IS - 2

ER -