Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Zones of indistinction : camps of security and ...
View graph of relations

Zones of indistinction : camps of security and terror.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Zones of indistinction : camps of security and terror. / Diken, Bulent; Laustsen, Carsten Bagge.
In: Space and Culture, Vol. 5, No. 3, 08.2002, p. 290-307.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Diken, B & Laustsen, CB 2002, 'Zones of indistinction : camps of security and terror.', Space and Culture, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 290-307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331202005003009

APA

Vancouver

Diken B, Laustsen CB. Zones of indistinction : camps of security and terror. Space and Culture. 2002 Aug;5(3):290-307. doi: 10.1177/1206331202005003009

Author

Diken, Bulent ; Laustsen, Carsten Bagge. / Zones of indistinction : camps of security and terror. In: Space and Culture. 2002 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 290-307.

Bibtex

@article{f87cf1b475334a33adc7a6cbe2837e83,
title = "Zones of indistinction : camps of security and terror.",
abstract = "Since the late 1970s, the focus on the {"}urban question{"} has shifted from the question of social movements to the question of social control and violence, from political struggle to {"}postpolitical{"} risk management. In this context, the city is increasingly transformed into a {"}network city{"}: fragmented space held together by technologies of mobility and flexible forms of power. The transition from {"}disciplinary society{"} to {"}societies of control{"} is decisive. It is increasingly evident that post-politics, based on technologies of control, is not a peaceful social order and brings with it new forms of violence: terror. The article elaborates on the relationship between these three successive forms of power (discipline, control, and terror) by focusing on their common denominator, that is, the creation of spaces of {"}indistinction.{"} With Agamben, it is argued that the {"}camp,{"} the logic that combines discipline, control, and terror, is becoming the biopolitical paradigm of today's societies.",
author = "Bulent Diken and Laustsen, {Carsten Bagge}",
year = "2002",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1177/1206331202005003009",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "290--307",
journal = "Space and Culture",
issn = "1552-8308",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Zones of indistinction : camps of security and terror.

AU - Diken, Bulent

AU - Laustsen, Carsten Bagge

PY - 2002/8

Y1 - 2002/8

N2 - Since the late 1970s, the focus on the "urban question" has shifted from the question of social movements to the question of social control and violence, from political struggle to "postpolitical" risk management. In this context, the city is increasingly transformed into a "network city": fragmented space held together by technologies of mobility and flexible forms of power. The transition from "disciplinary society" to "societies of control" is decisive. It is increasingly evident that post-politics, based on technologies of control, is not a peaceful social order and brings with it new forms of violence: terror. The article elaborates on the relationship between these three successive forms of power (discipline, control, and terror) by focusing on their common denominator, that is, the creation of spaces of "indistinction." With Agamben, it is argued that the "camp," the logic that combines discipline, control, and terror, is becoming the biopolitical paradigm of today's societies.

AB - Since the late 1970s, the focus on the "urban question" has shifted from the question of social movements to the question of social control and violence, from political struggle to "postpolitical" risk management. In this context, the city is increasingly transformed into a "network city": fragmented space held together by technologies of mobility and flexible forms of power. The transition from "disciplinary society" to "societies of control" is decisive. It is increasingly evident that post-politics, based on technologies of control, is not a peaceful social order and brings with it new forms of violence: terror. The article elaborates on the relationship between these three successive forms of power (discipline, control, and terror) by focusing on their common denominator, that is, the creation of spaces of "indistinction." With Agamben, it is argued that the "camp," the logic that combines discipline, control, and terror, is becoming the biopolitical paradigm of today's societies.

U2 - 10.1177/1206331202005003009

DO - 10.1177/1206331202005003009

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

SP - 290

EP - 307

JO - Space and Culture

JF - Space and Culture

SN - 1552-8308

IS - 3

ER -