Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A strange sort of survival for Pinnel's case

Associated organisational unit

View graph of relations

A strange sort of survival for Pinnel's case: Collier v. P.& M.J. Wright (Holdings) Limited

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A strange sort of survival for Pinnel's case : Collier v. P.& M.J. Wright (Holdings) Limited. / Austen-Baker, R.

In: Modern Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, 2008, p. 611-620.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{9ec771b913cb4164968b55b3c6b919d9,
title = "A strange sort of survival for Pinnel's case: Collier v. P.& M.J. Wright (Holdings) Limited",
abstract = "This note discusses the decision of the Court of Appeal in Collier v. P & M J Wright (Holdings) Limited, and notes that while the Court purports to uphold both the decision in Pinnel's Case and the effect of Re Selectmove, in fact, by an extension of promissory estoppel, it bypasses them.",
author = "R. Austen-Baker",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00708.x",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "611--620",
journal = "Modern Law Review",
issn = "0026-7961",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A strange sort of survival for Pinnel's case

T2 - Collier v. P.& M.J. Wright (Holdings) Limited

AU - Austen-Baker, R.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This note discusses the decision of the Court of Appeal in Collier v. P & M J Wright (Holdings) Limited, and notes that while the Court purports to uphold both the decision in Pinnel's Case and the effect of Re Selectmove, in fact, by an extension of promissory estoppel, it bypasses them.

AB - This note discusses the decision of the Court of Appeal in Collier v. P & M J Wright (Holdings) Limited, and notes that while the Court purports to uphold both the decision in Pinnel's Case and the effect of Re Selectmove, in fact, by an extension of promissory estoppel, it bypasses them.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00708.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00708.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 71

SP - 611

EP - 620

JO - Modern Law Review

JF - Modern Law Review

SN - 0026-7961

IS - 4

ER -