Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Collective control, social-cohesion and health ...

Electronic data

  • JPH_Manuscript_Revised_with_tables_14.10.20

    Rights statement: This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Public Health following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version V J McGowan, N Akhter, E Halliday, J Popay, A Kasim, C Bambra, Collective control, social cohesion and health and well-being: baseline survey results from the communities in control study in England, Journal of Public Health, 2021; [vol]:[pp-pp] is available online at: http://bjps.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/55/1/73

    Accepted author manuscript, 371 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 11/01/22

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Collective control, social-cohesion and health and wellbeing: Baseline survey results from the Communities in Control Study in England

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>11/01/2021
<mark>Journal</mark>Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom)
Publication StatusE-pub ahead of print
Early online date11/01/21
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Background: Area-based initiatives (ABIs) are receiving renewed interest as part of ‘place-based public health’ approaches to reducing health inequalities. Purpose: Examine associations between collective control, social-cohesion and health amongst residents involved in the Big Local ABI. Methods: Survey data on general health, mental wellbeing, perceptions of individual and collective control, and social-cohesion was obtained in 2016 for 1600 residents involved in the 150 Big Local ABI areas in England, 862 responded - a response rate of >50%. Adjusted mean differences and adjusted odds ratios were calculated using random effect linear and generalised estimating equation models. Subgroup analysis by gender and educational level was conducted.Results: Mental wellbeing was positively associated with collective control (Mean Difference 3.06 units, 1.23-4.90) and some measures of social cohesion (‘people in the area are willing to help each other’ [Mean Difference 1.77 units, 0.75-2.78]). General health was positively associated with other measures of social cohesion (area-belonging [Odds Ratio 4.25, 2.26-7.97]). Conclusion: Collective control and some aspects of social cohesion were positively associated with better mental wellbeing and self-rated health amongst residents involved with Big Local. These positive associations were often greater amongst women and participants with a lower education. Increasing the collective control residents have in ABIs could improve the health effects of ABIs.

Bibliographic note

This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Public Health following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version V J McGowan, N Akhter, E Halliday, J Popay, A Kasim, C Bambra, Collective control, social cohesion and health and well-being: baseline survey results from the communities in control study in England, Journal of Public Health, 2021; [vol]:[pp-pp] is available online at: http://bjps.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/55/1/73