Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Kurt Lewin's field theory
View graph of relations

Kurt Lewin's field theory: a review and re-evaluation

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Kurt Lewin's field theory: a review and re-evaluation. / Burnes, Bernard; Cooke, Bill.
In: International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 15, No. 4, 10.2013, p. 408-425.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Burnes, B & Cooke, B 2013, 'Kurt Lewin's field theory: a review and re-evaluation', International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 408-425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00348.x

APA

Burnes, B., & Cooke, B. (2013). Kurt Lewin's field theory: a review and re-evaluation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4), 408-425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00348.x

Vancouver

Burnes B, Cooke B. Kurt Lewin's field theory: a review and re-evaluation. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2013 Oct;15(4):408-425. Epub 2012 Sept 9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00348.x

Author

Burnes, Bernard ; Cooke, Bill. / Kurt Lewin's field theory : a review and re-evaluation. In: International Journal of Management Reviews. 2013 ; Vol. 15, No. 4. pp. 408-425.

Bibtex

@article{8446bef14edc41d384b91ff0cb9b8a87,
title = "Kurt Lewin's field theory: a review and re-evaluation",
abstract = "Field theory was central to Kurt Lewin's work yet, after his death, interest in it declined significantly until the 1990s when a variant, force field analysis, became widely used. This paper examines the origins, purpose and continuing relevance of field theory. It especially looks at the influences of gestalt psychology, topology and Ernst Cassirer's philosophy of science on its development. It argues that Lewin's attempt to replace conventional topology with his own Lewinian mathematics-based topology in pursuit of scientific rigour resulted in the undermining of its relevance. The paper also compares force field analysis with Lewin's original conception of field theory and shows that it has significant weaknesses in terms of rigour. It concludes that a return to Lewin's original conception of field theory, based on gestalt psychology and conventional topology, can provide academics and practitioners with a valuable and much-needed approach to managing change.",
author = "Bernard Burnes and Bill Cooke",
year = "2013",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00348.x",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "408--425",
journal = "International Journal of Management Reviews",
issn = "1460-8545",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Kurt Lewin's field theory

T2 - a review and re-evaluation

AU - Burnes, Bernard

AU - Cooke, Bill

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - Field theory was central to Kurt Lewin's work yet, after his death, interest in it declined significantly until the 1990s when a variant, force field analysis, became widely used. This paper examines the origins, purpose and continuing relevance of field theory. It especially looks at the influences of gestalt psychology, topology and Ernst Cassirer's philosophy of science on its development. It argues that Lewin's attempt to replace conventional topology with his own Lewinian mathematics-based topology in pursuit of scientific rigour resulted in the undermining of its relevance. The paper also compares force field analysis with Lewin's original conception of field theory and shows that it has significant weaknesses in terms of rigour. It concludes that a return to Lewin's original conception of field theory, based on gestalt psychology and conventional topology, can provide academics and practitioners with a valuable and much-needed approach to managing change.

AB - Field theory was central to Kurt Lewin's work yet, after his death, interest in it declined significantly until the 1990s when a variant, force field analysis, became widely used. This paper examines the origins, purpose and continuing relevance of field theory. It especially looks at the influences of gestalt psychology, topology and Ernst Cassirer's philosophy of science on its development. It argues that Lewin's attempt to replace conventional topology with his own Lewinian mathematics-based topology in pursuit of scientific rigour resulted in the undermining of its relevance. The paper also compares force field analysis with Lewin's original conception of field theory and shows that it has significant weaknesses in terms of rigour. It concludes that a return to Lewin's original conception of field theory, based on gestalt psychology and conventional topology, can provide academics and practitioners with a valuable and much-needed approach to managing change.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00348.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00348.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 15

SP - 408

EP - 425

JO - International Journal of Management Reviews

JF - International Journal of Management Reviews

SN - 1460-8545

IS - 4

ER -