Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Multi-axis point absorber wave energy converters

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • 2019richardsonphd internal

    Final published version, 8.26 MB, PDF document

  • 2019richardsonphd

    Final published version, 8.26 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Multi-axis point absorber wave energy converters

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Published

Standard

Multi-axis point absorber wave energy converters. / Richardson, Daniel.
Lancaster University, 2019. 179 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Harvard

APA

Richardson, D. (2019). Multi-axis point absorber wave energy converters. [Doctoral Thesis, Lancaster University]. Lancaster University. https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/616

Vancouver

Richardson D. Multi-axis point absorber wave energy converters. Lancaster University, 2019. 179 p. doi: 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/616

Author

Bibtex

@phdthesis{203f13baac684c4283c795f609150b66,
title = "Multi-axis point absorber wave energy converters",
abstract = "A multi-axis point absorber wave energy converter (MA-PAWEC) can be defined as a point absorber wave energy converter that absorbs energy from multiple modes of body motion using a power-take-off (PTO) system operating in multiple degrees of freedom. There is a lack of knowledge around whether MA-PAWECs could produce a lower cost of energy compared to the most common point absorber type, the heaving device. This research seeks to address this gap. A generic spherical MA-PAWEC with PTO on the heave and surge axes is assessed on an energy absorption and cost of energy basis relative to an equivalent heaving device. Linear theory was used to model the energy absorption under motion and power constraints. For heave+surge MA-PAWECs the results suggest that for low power constraints (relative to wave climate) and large available excursions then surge as the primary axis with heave as a secondary axis may be the most cost effective option. If the power constraint is large and excursions are tightly limited heave should be the primary axis with surge a secondary axis. By selecting axes that are best suited for different wave types a MA-PAWEC can absorb energy more consistently. This gives better utilisation of grid connection infrastructure: a MA-PAWEC with the same rated grid connection as a single axis equivalent can deliver significantly more energy. A MA-PAWEC should have its PTO system sized with the sum of the individual axes PTO limits higher than the rated device output.The relative cost-of-energy for the MA-PAWEC vs. the heave device under the modelling conditions considered here suggests that MA-PAWECs have the potential to be both significantly better and significantly worse than the incumbent heave devices. MA-PAWECs are therefore not a clear-cut advancement over heave devices, but the performance upside justifies further research in to this device type.",
author = "Daniel Richardson",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.17635/lancaster/thesis/616",
language = "English",
publisher = "Lancaster University",
school = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Multi-axis point absorber wave energy converters

AU - Richardson, Daniel

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - A multi-axis point absorber wave energy converter (MA-PAWEC) can be defined as a point absorber wave energy converter that absorbs energy from multiple modes of body motion using a power-take-off (PTO) system operating in multiple degrees of freedom. There is a lack of knowledge around whether MA-PAWECs could produce a lower cost of energy compared to the most common point absorber type, the heaving device. This research seeks to address this gap. A generic spherical MA-PAWEC with PTO on the heave and surge axes is assessed on an energy absorption and cost of energy basis relative to an equivalent heaving device. Linear theory was used to model the energy absorption under motion and power constraints. For heave+surge MA-PAWECs the results suggest that for low power constraints (relative to wave climate) and large available excursions then surge as the primary axis with heave as a secondary axis may be the most cost effective option. If the power constraint is large and excursions are tightly limited heave should be the primary axis with surge a secondary axis. By selecting axes that are best suited for different wave types a MA-PAWEC can absorb energy more consistently. This gives better utilisation of grid connection infrastructure: a MA-PAWEC with the same rated grid connection as a single axis equivalent can deliver significantly more energy. A MA-PAWEC should have its PTO system sized with the sum of the individual axes PTO limits higher than the rated device output.The relative cost-of-energy for the MA-PAWEC vs. the heave device under the modelling conditions considered here suggests that MA-PAWECs have the potential to be both significantly better and significantly worse than the incumbent heave devices. MA-PAWECs are therefore not a clear-cut advancement over heave devices, but the performance upside justifies further research in to this device type.

AB - A multi-axis point absorber wave energy converter (MA-PAWEC) can be defined as a point absorber wave energy converter that absorbs energy from multiple modes of body motion using a power-take-off (PTO) system operating in multiple degrees of freedom. There is a lack of knowledge around whether MA-PAWECs could produce a lower cost of energy compared to the most common point absorber type, the heaving device. This research seeks to address this gap. A generic spherical MA-PAWEC with PTO on the heave and surge axes is assessed on an energy absorption and cost of energy basis relative to an equivalent heaving device. Linear theory was used to model the energy absorption under motion and power constraints. For heave+surge MA-PAWECs the results suggest that for low power constraints (relative to wave climate) and large available excursions then surge as the primary axis with heave as a secondary axis may be the most cost effective option. If the power constraint is large and excursions are tightly limited heave should be the primary axis with surge a secondary axis. By selecting axes that are best suited for different wave types a MA-PAWEC can absorb energy more consistently. This gives better utilisation of grid connection infrastructure: a MA-PAWEC with the same rated grid connection as a single axis equivalent can deliver significantly more energy. A MA-PAWEC should have its PTO system sized with the sum of the individual axes PTO limits higher than the rated device output.The relative cost-of-energy for the MA-PAWEC vs. the heave device under the modelling conditions considered here suggests that MA-PAWECs have the potential to be both significantly better and significantly worse than the incumbent heave devices. MA-PAWECs are therefore not a clear-cut advancement over heave devices, but the performance upside justifies further research in to this device type.

U2 - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/616

DO - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/616

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

PB - Lancaster University

ER -