Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Psychiatrists' understanding and use of psychol...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Psychiatrists' understanding and use of psychological formulation: a qualitative exploration

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Psychiatrists' understanding and use of psychological formulation: a qualitative exploration. / Mohtashemi, Roxanna; Stevens, John; Jackson, Paul G. et al.
In: BJPsych Bulletin, Vol. 40, No. 4, 01.08.2016, p. 212.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Mohtashemi, R, Stevens, J, Jackson, PG & Weatherhead, S 2016, 'Psychiatrists' understanding and use of psychological formulation: a qualitative exploration', BJPsych Bulletin, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 212. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.051342

APA

Mohtashemi, R., Stevens, J., Jackson, P. G., & Weatherhead, S. (2016). Psychiatrists' understanding and use of psychological formulation: a qualitative exploration. BJPsych Bulletin, 40(4), 212. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.051342

Vancouver

Mohtashemi R, Stevens J, Jackson PG, Weatherhead S. Psychiatrists' understanding and use of psychological formulation: a qualitative exploration. BJPsych Bulletin. 2016 Aug 1;40(4):212. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.115.051342

Author

Mohtashemi, Roxanna ; Stevens, John ; Jackson, Paul G. et al. / Psychiatrists' understanding and use of psychological formulation : a qualitative exploration. In: BJPsych Bulletin. 2016 ; Vol. 40, No. 4. pp. 212.

Bibtex

@article{2e16ffb773fd41f6a3e06accc532cab4,
title = "Psychiatrists' understanding and use of psychological formulation: a qualitative exploration",
abstract = "Aims and method To establish an initial conceptualisation of how psychiatrists understand and use formulation within adult psychiatry practice. Twelve psychiatrists took part in semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were analysed using a constructivist grounded theory methodology.Results Formulation was conceptualised as an addition to diagnosis, triggered by risk, complexity and a need for an enhanced understanding. Participants valued collaborative formulation with psychologists. Multiple contextual factors were perceived to either facilitate or inhibit the process. Barriers to formulation led to a disjointed way of working.Clinical implications Findings contribute to an understanding of formulation within psychiatry training and practice.",
author = "Roxanna Mohtashemi and John Stevens and Jackson, {Paul G.} and Stephen Weatherhead",
year = "2016",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1192/pb.bp.115.051342",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "212",
journal = "BJPsych Bulletin",
publisher = "Royal College of Psychiatrists",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychiatrists' understanding and use of psychological formulation

T2 - a qualitative exploration

AU - Mohtashemi, Roxanna

AU - Stevens, John

AU - Jackson, Paul G.

AU - Weatherhead, Stephen

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Aims and method To establish an initial conceptualisation of how psychiatrists understand and use formulation within adult psychiatry practice. Twelve psychiatrists took part in semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were analysed using a constructivist grounded theory methodology.Results Formulation was conceptualised as an addition to diagnosis, triggered by risk, complexity and a need for an enhanced understanding. Participants valued collaborative formulation with psychologists. Multiple contextual factors were perceived to either facilitate or inhibit the process. Barriers to formulation led to a disjointed way of working.Clinical implications Findings contribute to an understanding of formulation within psychiatry training and practice.

AB - Aims and method To establish an initial conceptualisation of how psychiatrists understand and use formulation within adult psychiatry practice. Twelve psychiatrists took part in semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were analysed using a constructivist grounded theory methodology.Results Formulation was conceptualised as an addition to diagnosis, triggered by risk, complexity and a need for an enhanced understanding. Participants valued collaborative formulation with psychologists. Multiple contextual factors were perceived to either facilitate or inhibit the process. Barriers to formulation led to a disjointed way of working.Clinical implications Findings contribute to an understanding of formulation within psychiatry training and practice.

U2 - 10.1192/pb.bp.115.051342

DO - 10.1192/pb.bp.115.051342

M3 - Journal article

VL - 40

SP - 212

JO - BJPsych Bulletin

JF - BJPsych Bulletin

IS - 4

ER -