Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The Cognitive Micro-foundations, and Socio-psychological Mechanisms, of Organizational Decision-Making in Public Management
AU - Hodgkinson, Ian R.
AU - Hughes, Paul
AU - Leite, Higor
PY - 2023/4/30
Y1 - 2023/4/30
N2 - How do cognitive micro-foundations impact organizational decision-making in public management? The study focuses on the relationships between two cognitive micro-processes (intuitive, type I and rational, type II) and the contrasting organizational decision-making approaches of strategic planning and organizational spontaneity. Drawing on survey data from managers working across a range of public services in Brazil, the findings reveal that rational reasoning drives both approaches to organizational decision-making. Intuitive reasoning, on the other hand, is observed to drive strategic planning only. Two socio-psychological mechanisms moderate the core relationships: bureaucracy strengthens the rational reasoning–planning relationship, but weakens the intuitive reasoning–spontaneity relationship, while organizational learning plays a critical role in activating the intuitive reasoning–organizational spontaneity relationship. Post-hoc analysis of variance reveals a group of public service organizations that rely heavily on both decision-making modes and highlights the core features enabling paradoxical decision-making.
AB - How do cognitive micro-foundations impact organizational decision-making in public management? The study focuses on the relationships between two cognitive micro-processes (intuitive, type I and rational, type II) and the contrasting organizational decision-making approaches of strategic planning and organizational spontaneity. Drawing on survey data from managers working across a range of public services in Brazil, the findings reveal that rational reasoning drives both approaches to organizational decision-making. Intuitive reasoning, on the other hand, is observed to drive strategic planning only. Two socio-psychological mechanisms moderate the core relationships: bureaucracy strengthens the rational reasoning–planning relationship, but weakens the intuitive reasoning–spontaneity relationship, while organizational learning plays a critical role in activating the intuitive reasoning–organizational spontaneity relationship. Post-hoc analysis of variance reveals a group of public service organizations that rely heavily on both decision-making modes and highlights the core features enabling paradoxical decision-making.
U2 - 10.1111/1467-8551.12629
DO - 10.1111/1467-8551.12629
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85131518559
VL - 34
SP - 787
EP - 804
JO - British Journal of Management
JF - British Journal of Management
SN - 1045-3172
IS - 2
ER -