Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Which ethical values underpin England's Nationa...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Which ethical values underpin England's National Health Service reset of paediatric and maternity services following COVID-19: A rapid review

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Which ethical values underpin England's National Health Service reset of paediatric and maternity services following COVID-19 : A rapid review. / Chiumento, A.; Baines, P.; Redhead, C.; Fovargue, S.; Draper, H.; Frith, L.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 11, No. 6, e049214, 08.08.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Chiumento, A. ; Baines, P. ; Redhead, C. ; Fovargue, S. ; Draper, H. ; Frith, L. / Which ethical values underpin England's National Health Service reset of paediatric and maternity services following COVID-19 : A rapid review. In: BMJ Open. 2021 ; Vol. 11, No. 6.

Bibtex

@article{a1af73eaea734c66a4a4112be5cb4ba8,
title = "Which ethical values underpin England's National Health Service reset of paediatric and maternity services following COVID-19: A rapid review",
abstract = "Objective To identify ethical values guiding decision making in resetting non-COVID-19 paediatric surgery and maternity services in the National Health Service (NHS). Design A rapid review of academic and grey literature sources from 29 April to 31 December 2020, covering non-urgent, non-COVID-19 healthcare. Sources were thematically synthesised against an adapted version of the UK Government's Pandemic Flu Ethical Framework to identify underpinning ethical principles. The strength of normative engagement and the quality of the sources were also assessed. Setting NHS maternity and paediatric surgery services in England. Results Searches conducted 8 September-12 October 2020, and updated in March 2021, identified 48 sources meeting the inclusion criteria. Themes that arose include: staff safety; collaborative working - including mutual dependencies across the healthcare system; reciprocity; and inclusivity in service recovery, for example, by addressing inequalities in service access. Embedded in the theme of staff and patient safety is embracing new ways of working, such as the rapid roll out of telemedicine. On assessment, many sources did not explicitly consider how ethical principles might be applied or balanced against one another. Weaknesses in the policy sources included a lack of public and user involvement and the absence of monitoring and evaluation criteria. Conclusions Our findings suggest that relationality is a prominent ethical principle informing resetting NHS non-COVID-19 paediatric surgery and maternity services. Sources explicitly highlight the ethical importance of seeking to minimise disruption to caring and dependent relationships, while simultaneously attending to public safety. Engagement with ethical principles was ethics-lite, with sources mentioning principles in passing rather than explicitly applying them. This leaves decision makers and healthcare professionals without an operationalisable ethical framework to apply to difficult reset decisions and risks inconsistencies in decision making. We recommend further research to confirm or refine the usefulness of the reset phase ethical framework developed through our analysis. ",
keywords = "COVID-19, health policy, medical ethics, protocols & guidelines, qualitative research, child, England, female, human, national health service, pandemic, pregnancy, Child, Female, Humans, Pandemics, Pregnancy, SARS-CoV-2, State Medicine",
author = "A. Chiumento and P. Baines and C. Redhead and S. Fovargue and H. Draper and L. Frith",
year = "2021",
month = aug,
day = "8",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049214",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Which ethical values underpin England's National Health Service reset of paediatric and maternity services following COVID-19

T2 - A rapid review

AU - Chiumento, A.

AU - Baines, P.

AU - Redhead, C.

AU - Fovargue, S.

AU - Draper, H.

AU - Frith, L.

PY - 2021/8/8

Y1 - 2021/8/8

N2 - Objective To identify ethical values guiding decision making in resetting non-COVID-19 paediatric surgery and maternity services in the National Health Service (NHS). Design A rapid review of academic and grey literature sources from 29 April to 31 December 2020, covering non-urgent, non-COVID-19 healthcare. Sources were thematically synthesised against an adapted version of the UK Government's Pandemic Flu Ethical Framework to identify underpinning ethical principles. The strength of normative engagement and the quality of the sources were also assessed. Setting NHS maternity and paediatric surgery services in England. Results Searches conducted 8 September-12 October 2020, and updated in March 2021, identified 48 sources meeting the inclusion criteria. Themes that arose include: staff safety; collaborative working - including mutual dependencies across the healthcare system; reciprocity; and inclusivity in service recovery, for example, by addressing inequalities in service access. Embedded in the theme of staff and patient safety is embracing new ways of working, such as the rapid roll out of telemedicine. On assessment, many sources did not explicitly consider how ethical principles might be applied or balanced against one another. Weaknesses in the policy sources included a lack of public and user involvement and the absence of monitoring and evaluation criteria. Conclusions Our findings suggest that relationality is a prominent ethical principle informing resetting NHS non-COVID-19 paediatric surgery and maternity services. Sources explicitly highlight the ethical importance of seeking to minimise disruption to caring and dependent relationships, while simultaneously attending to public safety. Engagement with ethical principles was ethics-lite, with sources mentioning principles in passing rather than explicitly applying them. This leaves decision makers and healthcare professionals without an operationalisable ethical framework to apply to difficult reset decisions and risks inconsistencies in decision making. We recommend further research to confirm or refine the usefulness of the reset phase ethical framework developed through our analysis.

AB - Objective To identify ethical values guiding decision making in resetting non-COVID-19 paediatric surgery and maternity services in the National Health Service (NHS). Design A rapid review of academic and grey literature sources from 29 April to 31 December 2020, covering non-urgent, non-COVID-19 healthcare. Sources were thematically synthesised against an adapted version of the UK Government's Pandemic Flu Ethical Framework to identify underpinning ethical principles. The strength of normative engagement and the quality of the sources were also assessed. Setting NHS maternity and paediatric surgery services in England. Results Searches conducted 8 September-12 October 2020, and updated in March 2021, identified 48 sources meeting the inclusion criteria. Themes that arose include: staff safety; collaborative working - including mutual dependencies across the healthcare system; reciprocity; and inclusivity in service recovery, for example, by addressing inequalities in service access. Embedded in the theme of staff and patient safety is embracing new ways of working, such as the rapid roll out of telemedicine. On assessment, many sources did not explicitly consider how ethical principles might be applied or balanced against one another. Weaknesses in the policy sources included a lack of public and user involvement and the absence of monitoring and evaluation criteria. Conclusions Our findings suggest that relationality is a prominent ethical principle informing resetting NHS non-COVID-19 paediatric surgery and maternity services. Sources explicitly highlight the ethical importance of seeking to minimise disruption to caring and dependent relationships, while simultaneously attending to public safety. Engagement with ethical principles was ethics-lite, with sources mentioning principles in passing rather than explicitly applying them. This leaves decision makers and healthcare professionals without an operationalisable ethical framework to apply to difficult reset decisions and risks inconsistencies in decision making. We recommend further research to confirm or refine the usefulness of the reset phase ethical framework developed through our analysis.

KW - COVID-19

KW - health policy

KW - medical ethics

KW - protocols & guidelines

KW - qualitative research

KW - child

KW - England

KW - female

KW - human

KW - national health service

KW - pandemic

KW - pregnancy

KW - Child

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Pandemics

KW - Pregnancy

KW - SARS-CoV-2

KW - State Medicine

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049214

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049214

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 6

M1 - e049214

ER -