Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > BREXIT and English jurisdiction agreements

Electronic data

  • BREXIT_and_English_Jurisdiction_Agreemen

    Rights statement: Copyright © 2016 Kluwer Law International

    Accepted author manuscript, 482 KB, PDF-document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

View graph of relations

BREXIT and English jurisdiction agreements: the post-referendum legal landscape

Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issue

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/12/2016
<mark>Journal</mark>European Business Law Review
Issue number7
Volume27
Number of pages10
Pages (from-to)989-998
<mark>State</mark>Published
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

This article presents an early view of the impact of BREXIT on English jurisdiction agreements in international commercial contracts. It is almost certain that the Brussels I Recast Regulation will cease to apply in the UK after BREXIT and as a result the near automatic recognition and enforcement of English court judgments in the continuing EU (and Lugano Convention Contracting States) and vice versa will be in jeopardy. Contrary to some recent speculation, it is unlikely that the Brussels Convention will revive and the option to adhere to the Lugano Convention also does not seem to be viable for a newly ‘liberated’ UK. The article suggests practical solutions to minimise the litigation risk arising from English jurisdiction agreements in relation to the EU. Significantly, the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements can be harnessed to regulate English exclusive jurisdiction agreements in relation to the EU in matters within the scope of the Convention. If the courts of a post-BREXIT EU Member State are seised in a case concerning an English exclusive jurisdiction agreement, Article 6 of the Hague Convention should accord deference to the elected forum.

Bibliographic note

Copyright © 2016 Kluwer Law International