Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A formal comparison of different methods for es...
View graph of relations

A formal comparison of different methods for establishing cut points to distinguish positive and negative samples in immunoassays.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A formal comparison of different methods for establishing cut points to distinguish positive and negative samples in immunoassays. / Jaki, Thomas; Lawo, John-Philip; Wolfsegger, Martin J. et al.
In: Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, Vol. 55, No. 5, 15.07.2011, p. 1148-1156.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Jaki, T, Lawo, J-P, Wolfsegger, MJ, Singer, J, Allacher, P & Horling, F 2011, 'A formal comparison of different methods for establishing cut points to distinguish positive and negative samples in immunoassays.', Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1148-1156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2011.04.006

APA

Jaki, T., Lawo, J-P., Wolfsegger, M. J., Singer, J., Allacher, P., & Horling, F. (2011). A formal comparison of different methods for establishing cut points to distinguish positive and negative samples in immunoassays. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 55(5), 1148-1156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2011.04.006

Vancouver

Jaki T, Lawo J-P, Wolfsegger MJ, Singer J, Allacher P, Horling F. A formal comparison of different methods for establishing cut points to distinguish positive and negative samples in immunoassays. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2011 Jul 15;55(5):1148-1156. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.04.006

Author

Jaki, Thomas ; Lawo, John-Philip ; Wolfsegger, Martin J. et al. / A formal comparison of different methods for establishing cut points to distinguish positive and negative samples in immunoassays. In: Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2011 ; Vol. 55, No. 5. pp. 1148-1156.

Bibtex

@article{a4e192412fed4d669c269af121096a1b,
title = "A formal comparison of different methods for establishing cut points to distinguish positive and negative samples in immunoassays.",
abstract = "Biotechnology derived therapeutics may induce an unwanted immune response leading to the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). As a result the efficacy and safety of the therapeutic protein could be impaired. Neutralizing antibodies may, for example, affect pharmacokinetics of the therapeutic protein or induce autoimmunity. Therefore a drug induced immune response is a major concern and needs to be assessed during drug development. It is therefore crucial to have assays available for the detection and characterization of ADAs. These assays are used to classify samples in positive and negative samples based on a cut point. In this manuscript we investigate the performance of established and newly developed methods to determine a cut point in immunoassays such as ELISA through simulation and analysis of real data. The different methods are found to have different advantages and disadvantages. A robust parametric approach generally resulted in very good results and can be recommended for many situations. The newly introduced method based on mixture models yields similar results to the robust parametric approach but offers some additional flexibility at the expense of higher complexity.",
author = "Thomas Jaki and John-Philip Lawo and Wolfsegger, {Martin J.} and Julia Singer and Peter Allacher and Frank Horling",
year = "2011",
month = jul,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpba.2011.04.006",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "1148--1156",
journal = "Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis",
issn = "0731-7085",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A formal comparison of different methods for establishing cut points to distinguish positive and negative samples in immunoassays.

AU - Jaki, Thomas

AU - Lawo, John-Philip

AU - Wolfsegger, Martin J.

AU - Singer, Julia

AU - Allacher, Peter

AU - Horling, Frank

PY - 2011/7/15

Y1 - 2011/7/15

N2 - Biotechnology derived therapeutics may induce an unwanted immune response leading to the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). As a result the efficacy and safety of the therapeutic protein could be impaired. Neutralizing antibodies may, for example, affect pharmacokinetics of the therapeutic protein or induce autoimmunity. Therefore a drug induced immune response is a major concern and needs to be assessed during drug development. It is therefore crucial to have assays available for the detection and characterization of ADAs. These assays are used to classify samples in positive and negative samples based on a cut point. In this manuscript we investigate the performance of established and newly developed methods to determine a cut point in immunoassays such as ELISA through simulation and analysis of real data. The different methods are found to have different advantages and disadvantages. A robust parametric approach generally resulted in very good results and can be recommended for many situations. The newly introduced method based on mixture models yields similar results to the robust parametric approach but offers some additional flexibility at the expense of higher complexity.

AB - Biotechnology derived therapeutics may induce an unwanted immune response leading to the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). As a result the efficacy and safety of the therapeutic protein could be impaired. Neutralizing antibodies may, for example, affect pharmacokinetics of the therapeutic protein or induce autoimmunity. Therefore a drug induced immune response is a major concern and needs to be assessed during drug development. It is therefore crucial to have assays available for the detection and characterization of ADAs. These assays are used to classify samples in positive and negative samples based on a cut point. In this manuscript we investigate the performance of established and newly developed methods to determine a cut point in immunoassays such as ELISA through simulation and analysis of real data. The different methods are found to have different advantages and disadvantages. A robust parametric approach generally resulted in very good results and can be recommended for many situations. The newly introduced method based on mixture models yields similar results to the robust parametric approach but offers some additional flexibility at the expense of higher complexity.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.04.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.04.006

M3 - Journal article

VL - 55

SP - 1148

EP - 1156

JO - Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis

JF - Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis

SN - 0731-7085

IS - 5

ER -