Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A human right to science?

Electronic data

  • Human_right_to_science_bioprospecting_in_Madagascar.docx_ACCEPT

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Annals of the American Association of Geographers on 30/09/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/24694452.2016.1218749

    Accepted author manuscript, 143 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A human right to science?: precarious labor and basic rights in science and bioprospecting

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A human right to science? precarious labor and basic rights in science and bioprospecting. / Neimark, Benjamin David; Vermeylen, Saskia.
In: Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 107, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 167-182.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Neimark, BD & Vermeylen, S 2017, 'A human right to science? precarious labor and basic rights in science and bioprospecting', Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1218749

APA

Vancouver

Neimark BD, Vermeylen S. A human right to science? precarious labor and basic rights in science and bioprospecting. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2017 Jan 1;107(1):167-182. Epub 2016 Sept 30. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2016.1218749

Author

Neimark, Benjamin David ; Vermeylen, Saskia. / A human right to science? precarious labor and basic rights in science and bioprospecting. In: Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2017 ; Vol. 107, No. 1. pp. 167-182.

Bibtex

@article{0d5a96b45601410fac276b20fe023655,
title = "A human right to science?: precarious labor and basic rights in science and bioprospecting",
abstract = "Does everyone have the right to benefit from science? If so, what shape should benefits take? This article exposes the inequalities involved in bioprospecting through a relatively neglected human right, the right to benefit from science (HRS). Although underexplored in the literature, it is acknowledged that market-based conservation practices, such as bioprospecting, often rely on cheap “casual” labor. In contrast to critical discourses exposing the exploitation and misappropriation of indigenous people's cultural and self-determination rights in relation to bioprospecting (i.e., biopiracy), the exploitation of a low-skilled labor force for science has been little examined from a human rights perspective. Reliance on cheap labor is not limited just to those directly involved in creating local biodiversity inventories but constitutes a whole set of other workers (cooks, porters, and logistical support staff), who contribute indirectly to the advancements of science and whose contribution is barely acknowledged, let alone financially remunerated. As precarious workers, it is difficult for laborers to use existing national and international labor laws to fight for recognition of their basic rights or easily to rely on biodiversity and environmental laws to negotiate recognition of their contribution to science. We explore to what extent the HRS can be used to encourage governments, civil society, and companies to provide basic labor and social rights to science. This should be of keen interest to geographers, who for the most part have limited engagement in human rights law, and has wider significance for those interested in exploitative labor and rights violations in the emerging bio- and green economy.",
author = "Neimark, {Benjamin David} and Saskia Vermeylen",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Annals of the American Association of Geographers on 30/09/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/24694452.2016.1218749",
year = "2017",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/24694452.2016.1218749",
language = "English",
volume = "107",
pages = "167--182",
journal = "Annals of the Association of American Geographers",
issn = "0004-5608",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A human right to science?

T2 - precarious labor and basic rights in science and bioprospecting

AU - Neimark, Benjamin David

AU - Vermeylen, Saskia

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Annals of the American Association of Geographers on 30/09/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/24694452.2016.1218749

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Does everyone have the right to benefit from science? If so, what shape should benefits take? This article exposes the inequalities involved in bioprospecting through a relatively neglected human right, the right to benefit from science (HRS). Although underexplored in the literature, it is acknowledged that market-based conservation practices, such as bioprospecting, often rely on cheap “casual” labor. In contrast to critical discourses exposing the exploitation and misappropriation of indigenous people's cultural and self-determination rights in relation to bioprospecting (i.e., biopiracy), the exploitation of a low-skilled labor force for science has been little examined from a human rights perspective. Reliance on cheap labor is not limited just to those directly involved in creating local biodiversity inventories but constitutes a whole set of other workers (cooks, porters, and logistical support staff), who contribute indirectly to the advancements of science and whose contribution is barely acknowledged, let alone financially remunerated. As precarious workers, it is difficult for laborers to use existing national and international labor laws to fight for recognition of their basic rights or easily to rely on biodiversity and environmental laws to negotiate recognition of their contribution to science. We explore to what extent the HRS can be used to encourage governments, civil society, and companies to provide basic labor and social rights to science. This should be of keen interest to geographers, who for the most part have limited engagement in human rights law, and has wider significance for those interested in exploitative labor and rights violations in the emerging bio- and green economy.

AB - Does everyone have the right to benefit from science? If so, what shape should benefits take? This article exposes the inequalities involved in bioprospecting through a relatively neglected human right, the right to benefit from science (HRS). Although underexplored in the literature, it is acknowledged that market-based conservation practices, such as bioprospecting, often rely on cheap “casual” labor. In contrast to critical discourses exposing the exploitation and misappropriation of indigenous people's cultural and self-determination rights in relation to bioprospecting (i.e., biopiracy), the exploitation of a low-skilled labor force for science has been little examined from a human rights perspective. Reliance on cheap labor is not limited just to those directly involved in creating local biodiversity inventories but constitutes a whole set of other workers (cooks, porters, and logistical support staff), who contribute indirectly to the advancements of science and whose contribution is barely acknowledged, let alone financially remunerated. As precarious workers, it is difficult for laborers to use existing national and international labor laws to fight for recognition of their basic rights or easily to rely on biodiversity and environmental laws to negotiate recognition of their contribution to science. We explore to what extent the HRS can be used to encourage governments, civil society, and companies to provide basic labor and social rights to science. This should be of keen interest to geographers, who for the most part have limited engagement in human rights law, and has wider significance for those interested in exploitative labor and rights violations in the emerging bio- and green economy.

U2 - 10.1080/24694452.2016.1218749

DO - 10.1080/24694452.2016.1218749

M3 - Journal article

VL - 107

SP - 167

EP - 182

JO - Annals of the Association of American Geographers

JF - Annals of the Association of American Geographers

SN - 0004-5608

IS - 1

ER -