12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A unified formulation for circle and polygon co...
View graph of relations

« Back

A unified formulation for circle and polygon concrete-filled steel tube columns under axial compression

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Journal publication date04/2013
JournalEngineering Structures
Volume49
Number of pages10
Pages1-10
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Current design practice of concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) columns uses different formulas for different section profiles to predict the axial load bearing capacity. It has always been a challenge and practically important issue for researchers and design engineers who want to find a unified formula that can be used in the design of the columns with various sections, including solid, hollow, circular and polygonal sections. This has been driven by modern design requirements for continuous optimization of structures in terms of not only the use of materials, but also the topology of structural components. This paper extends the authors’ previous work [1] on a unified formulation of the axial load bearing capacity for circular hollow and solid CFST columns to, now, including hollow and solid CFST columns with regular polygonal sections. This is done by taking a circular section as a special case of a polygonal one. Finally, a unified formula is proposed for calculating the axial load bearing capacity of solid and hollow CFST columns with either circular or polygonal sections. In addition, laboratory tests on hollow circular and square CFST long columns are reported. These results are useful addition to the very limited open literature on testing these columns, and are also as a part of the validation process of the proposed analytical formulas.

Bibliographic note

The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Engineering Structures 49, 2013, © ELSEVIER.