Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Editorial › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Editorial › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Associating versus proposing or associating what we propose: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006)
AU - Albarracin, Dolores
AU - Hart, William
AU - McCulloch, Kathleen C.
PY - 2006/9
Y1 - 2006/9
N2 - This commentary highlights the strengths of the associative-propositional evaluation model. It then describes problems in proposing a qualitative separation between propositional and associative processes. Propositional processes are instead described as associative. Propositions are ordered associations, whereas many other associations do not depend on the order of the involved elements. Implications of this alternative definition for the phenomenology of thought and for social psychology are discussed.
AB - This commentary highlights the strengths of the associative-propositional evaluation model. It then describes problems in proposing a qualitative separation between propositional and associative processes. Propositional processes are instead described as associative. Propositions are ordered associations, whereas many other associations do not depend on the order of the involved elements. Implications of this alternative definition for the phenomenology of thought and for social psychology are discussed.
U2 - 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.732
DO - 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.732
M3 - Editorial
VL - 132
SP - 732
EP - 735
JO - Psychological Bulletin
JF - Psychological Bulletin
SN - 0033-2909
IS - 5
ER -