Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Associating versus proposing or associating wha...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Associating versus proposing or associating what we propose: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006)

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Editorial › peer-review

Published

Standard

Associating versus proposing or associating what we propose: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006). / Albarracin, Dolores; Hart, William; McCulloch, Kathleen C.
In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 132, No. 5, 09.2006, p. 732-735.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Editorial › peer-review

Harvard

Albarracin, D, Hart, W & McCulloch, KC 2006, 'Associating versus proposing or associating what we propose: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006)', Psychological Bulletin, vol. 132, no. 5, pp. 732-735. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.732

APA

Albarracin, D., Hart, W., & McCulloch, K. C. (2006). Associating versus proposing or associating what we propose: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006). Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 732-735. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.732

Vancouver

Albarracin D, Hart W, McCulloch KC. Associating versus proposing or associating what we propose: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006). Psychological Bulletin. 2006 Sept;132(5):732-735. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.732

Author

Albarracin, Dolores ; Hart, William ; McCulloch, Kathleen C. / Associating versus proposing or associating what we propose: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006). In: Psychological Bulletin. 2006 ; Vol. 132, No. 5. pp. 732-735.

Bibtex

@article{329dad612c5f44b6a182ea05ff151c4f,
title = "Associating versus proposing or associating what we propose: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006)",
abstract = "This commentary highlights the strengths of the associative-propositional evaluation model. It then describes problems in proposing a qualitative separation between propositional and associative processes. Propositional processes are instead described as associative. Propositions are ordered associations, whereas many other associations do not depend on the order of the involved elements. Implications of this alternative definition for the phenomenology of thought and for social psychology are discussed.",
author = "Dolores Albarracin and William Hart and McCulloch, {Kathleen C.}",
year = "2006",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.732",
language = "English",
volume = "132",
pages = "732--735",
journal = "Psychological Bulletin",
issn = "0033-2909",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Associating versus proposing or associating what we propose: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006)

AU - Albarracin, Dolores

AU - Hart, William

AU - McCulloch, Kathleen C.

PY - 2006/9

Y1 - 2006/9

N2 - This commentary highlights the strengths of the associative-propositional evaluation model. It then describes problems in proposing a qualitative separation between propositional and associative processes. Propositional processes are instead described as associative. Propositions are ordered associations, whereas many other associations do not depend on the order of the involved elements. Implications of this alternative definition for the phenomenology of thought and for social psychology are discussed.

AB - This commentary highlights the strengths of the associative-propositional evaluation model. It then describes problems in proposing a qualitative separation between propositional and associative processes. Propositional processes are instead described as associative. Propositions are ordered associations, whereas many other associations do not depend on the order of the involved elements. Implications of this alternative definition for the phenomenology of thought and for social psychology are discussed.

U2 - 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.732

DO - 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.732

M3 - Editorial

VL - 132

SP - 732

EP - 735

JO - Psychological Bulletin

JF - Psychological Bulletin

SN - 0033-2909

IS - 5

ER -