Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Beyond the poles in attractor models of inflation

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Beyond the poles in attractor models of inflation

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Article number022
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>12/09/2019
<mark>Journal</mark>Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Issue number9
Volume2019
Number of pages34
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

We offer a geometric interpretation of attractor theories with singular kinetic terms as a union of multiple canonical models. We demonstrate that different domains (separated by poles) can drastically differ in their phenomenology. We illustrate this with the help of a "master model" that leads to distinct predictions depending on which side of the pole the field evolves before examining the more realistic example of alpha-attractor models. Such models lead to quintessential inflation within the poles when featuring an exponential potential. However, beyond the poles, we discover a novel behaviour: the scalar field responsible for the early-time acceleration of the Universe may reach the boundary of the field-space manifold, indicating that the theory is incomplete and that a boundary condition must be imposed in order to determine its late-time behaviour. If the evolution of the field is arrested before this happens, however, we discover that quintessence can be achieved without a potential offset. Turning to multifield models with singular kinetic terms, we see that poles generalise straightforwardly to singular curves, which act as "model walls" between distinct pole-free inflationary models. As an example, we study a simple two-field alpha-attractor-inspired model, whose evolution of isocurvature perturbations is sensitive to where the non-canonical field begins its trajectory. We finally discuss initial conditions in attractor theories, where the existence of multiple disconnected canonical models implies that we must make a fundamental choice: in which domain we impose a distribution for the inflaton in order to then determine the likelihood of inflation.