Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Comparing and combining expanding retrieval pra...
View graph of relations

Comparing and combining expanding retrieval practice and the keyword mnemonic for foreign vocabulary learning.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Comparing and combining expanding retrieval practice and the keyword mnemonic for foreign vocabulary learning. / Fritz, C.; Morris, P. E.; Acton, M.; Voelkel, A. R.; Etkind, R.

In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2007, p. 499-526.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Fritz, C. ; Morris, P. E. ; Acton, M. ; Voelkel, A. R. ; Etkind, R. / Comparing and combining expanding retrieval practice and the keyword mnemonic for foreign vocabulary learning. In: Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2007 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 499-526.

Bibtex

@article{bfb7f898289847ef9dfd0ff5e4f3be21,
title = "Comparing and combining expanding retrieval practice and the keyword mnemonic for foreign vocabulary learning.",
abstract = "Experiment 1 compared the effectiveness of retrieval practice, the keyword mnemonic and rote rehearsal for learning foreign language vocabulary. Both mnemonic methods produced similar recall and were superior to rote rehearsal. In Experiment 2, participants learned German vocabulary using keywords, retrieval practice or their own method. Retrieval practice and keyword-based recall were similar and superior to self-directed study. In Experiment 3, participants studied using keywords, retrieval practice, a combination or an elaboration strategy. Criterion testing occurred immediately and after a week. For receptive learning, retrieval practice and keywords were equally beneficial but for productive learning, retrieval practice was more effective. Combining strategies produced mixed results with significant benefits only for receptive learning in the delayed test. Copyright # 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
keywords = "memory, retrieval practice, foreign language learning",
author = "C. Fritz and Morris, {P. E.} and M. Acton and Voelkel, {A. R.} and R. Etkind",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1002/acp.1287",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "499--526",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0888-4080",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing and combining expanding retrieval practice and the keyword mnemonic for foreign vocabulary learning.

AU - Fritz, C.

AU - Morris, P. E.

AU - Acton, M.

AU - Voelkel, A. R.

AU - Etkind, R.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Experiment 1 compared the effectiveness of retrieval practice, the keyword mnemonic and rote rehearsal for learning foreign language vocabulary. Both mnemonic methods produced similar recall and were superior to rote rehearsal. In Experiment 2, participants learned German vocabulary using keywords, retrieval practice or their own method. Retrieval practice and keyword-based recall were similar and superior to self-directed study. In Experiment 3, participants studied using keywords, retrieval practice, a combination or an elaboration strategy. Criterion testing occurred immediately and after a week. For receptive learning, retrieval practice and keywords were equally beneficial but for productive learning, retrieval practice was more effective. Combining strategies produced mixed results with significant benefits only for receptive learning in the delayed test. Copyright # 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AB - Experiment 1 compared the effectiveness of retrieval practice, the keyword mnemonic and rote rehearsal for learning foreign language vocabulary. Both mnemonic methods produced similar recall and were superior to rote rehearsal. In Experiment 2, participants learned German vocabulary using keywords, retrieval practice or their own method. Retrieval practice and keyword-based recall were similar and superior to self-directed study. In Experiment 3, participants studied using keywords, retrieval practice, a combination or an elaboration strategy. Criterion testing occurred immediately and after a week. For receptive learning, retrieval practice and keywords were equally beneficial but for productive learning, retrieval practice was more effective. Combining strategies produced mixed results with significant benefits only for receptive learning in the delayed test. Copyright # 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

KW - memory

KW - retrieval practice

KW - foreign language learning

U2 - 10.1002/acp.1287

DO - 10.1002/acp.1287

M3 - Journal article

VL - 21

SP - 499

EP - 526

JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0888-4080

IS - 4

ER -