Rights statement: © 2012 Bhattacharya et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Final published version, 2.14 MB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of cement pressurisation in flanged and unflanged acetabular cups
AU - Bhattacharya, Rajarshi
AU - Attar, Fahad G.
AU - Green, Sarah
AU - Port, Andrew
N1 - © 2012 Bhattacharya et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
PY - 2012/2/3
Y1 - 2012/2/3
N2 - BackgroundThis biomechanical study examined difference in cement pressures generated by flanged and unflanged acetabular cups in hip arthroplasty.MethodUsing a model acetabulum, cement was inserted and pressurised followed by cup insertion and pressurisation. Pressures were recorded using transducers in the acetabulum. We compared Charnley Ogee (flanged), Exeter contemporary (flanged) and Exeter low profile (unflanged) cups using Simplex and CMW1 cements in turn.ResultsUsing Simplex, Charnley Ogee cup generated highest initial peak pressure and overall mean pressure. Exeter unflanged cup generated higher initial and mean pressures compared to Exeter flanged cup. With CMW, there was no significant difference between the pressures generated by the cups.ConclusionsOur experiment suggests that flanged cups do not consistently generate significantly higher cement pressures compared to unflanged cups.Background
AB - BackgroundThis biomechanical study examined difference in cement pressures generated by flanged and unflanged acetabular cups in hip arthroplasty.MethodUsing a model acetabulum, cement was inserted and pressurised followed by cup insertion and pressurisation. Pressures were recorded using transducers in the acetabulum. We compared Charnley Ogee (flanged), Exeter contemporary (flanged) and Exeter low profile (unflanged) cups using Simplex and CMW1 cements in turn.ResultsUsing Simplex, Charnley Ogee cup generated highest initial peak pressure and overall mean pressure. Exeter unflanged cup generated higher initial and mean pressures compared to Exeter flanged cup. With CMW, there was no significant difference between the pressures generated by the cups.ConclusionsOur experiment suggests that flanged cups do not consistently generate significantly higher cement pressures compared to unflanged cups.Background
U2 - 10.1186/1749-799X-7-5
DO - 10.1186/1749-799X-7-5
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 22305294
VL - 7
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
SN - 1749-799X
IS - 1
M1 - 5
ER -