Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Could Moral Enhancement Interventions be Medically Indicated?
AU - Carter, Sarah
PY - 2017/12
Y1 - 2017/12
N2 - This paper explores the position that moral enhancement interventionscould be medically indicated (and so considered therapeutic) in cases where theyprovide a remedy for a lack of empathy, when such a deficit is considered pathological.In order to argue this claim, the question as to whether a deficit of empathycould be considered to be pathological is examined, taking into account the difficulty of defining illness and disorder generally, and especially in the case of mental health. Following this, Psychopathy and a fictionalised mental disorder (Moral Deficiency Disorder) are explored with a view to consider moral enhancement techniques as possible treatments for both conditions. At this juncture, having asserted and defended the position that moral enhancement interventions could, under certain circumstances, be considered medically indicated, this paper then goes on to briefly explore some of the consequences of this assertion. First, it is acknowledged that this broadening of diagnostic criteria in light of new interventions could fall foul of claims of medicalisation. It is then briefly noted that considering moral enhancement technologies to be akin to therapies in certain circumstances could lead to ethical and legal consequences and questions, such as those regarding regulation, access, and even consent.
AB - This paper explores the position that moral enhancement interventionscould be medically indicated (and so considered therapeutic) in cases where theyprovide a remedy for a lack of empathy, when such a deficit is considered pathological.In order to argue this claim, the question as to whether a deficit of empathycould be considered to be pathological is examined, taking into account the difficulty of defining illness and disorder generally, and especially in the case of mental health. Following this, Psychopathy and a fictionalised mental disorder (Moral Deficiency Disorder) are explored with a view to consider moral enhancement techniques as possible treatments for both conditions. At this juncture, having asserted and defended the position that moral enhancement interventions could, under certain circumstances, be considered medically indicated, this paper then goes on to briefly explore some of the consequences of this assertion. First, it is acknowledged that this broadening of diagnostic criteria in light of new interventions could fall foul of claims of medicalisation. It is then briefly noted that considering moral enhancement technologies to be akin to therapies in certain circumstances could lead to ethical and legal consequences and questions, such as those regarding regulation, access, and even consent.
KW - Moral enhancement
KW - Bioethics
KW - Neuroethics
KW - Moral therapy
KW - Empathy
KW - Enhancement
U2 - 10.1007/s10728-016-0320-8
DO - 10.1007/s10728-016-0320-8
M3 - Journal article
VL - 25
SP - 338
EP - 353
JO - Health Care Analysis
JF - Health Care Analysis
SN - 1065-3058
IS - 4
ER -