Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Could Moral Enhancement Interventions be Medica...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Could Moral Enhancement Interventions be Medically Indicated?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Could Moral Enhancement Interventions be Medically Indicated? / Carter, Sarah.
In: Health Care Analysis, Vol. 25, No. 4, 12.2017, p. 338-353.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Carter S. Could Moral Enhancement Interventions be Medically Indicated? Health Care Analysis. 2017 Dec;25(4):338-353. Epub 2016 Feb 24. doi: 10.1007/s10728-016-0320-8

Author

Carter, Sarah. / Could Moral Enhancement Interventions be Medically Indicated?. In: Health Care Analysis. 2017 ; Vol. 25, No. 4. pp. 338-353.

Bibtex

@article{326fa0ebd4f148409fc1b020cd90f2d3,
title = "Could Moral Enhancement Interventions be Medically Indicated?",
abstract = "This paper explores the position that moral enhancement interventionscould be medically indicated (and so considered therapeutic) in cases where theyprovide a remedy for a lack of empathy, when such a deficit is considered pathological.In order to argue this claim, the question as to whether a deficit of empathycould be considered to be pathological is examined, taking into account the difficulty of defining illness and disorder generally, and especially in the case of mental health. Following this, Psychopathy and a fictionalised mental disorder (Moral Deficiency Disorder) are explored with a view to consider moral enhancement techniques as possible treatments for both conditions. At this juncture, having asserted and defended the position that moral enhancement interventions could, under certain circumstances, be considered medically indicated, this paper then goes on to briefly explore some of the consequences of this assertion. First, it is acknowledged that this broadening of diagnostic criteria in light of new interventions could fall foul of claims of medicalisation. It is then briefly noted that considering moral enhancement technologies to be akin to therapies in certain circumstances could lead to ethical and legal consequences and questions, such as those regarding regulation, access, and even consent.",
keywords = "Moral enhancement, Bioethics , Neuroethics, Moral therapy, Empathy , Enhancement ",
author = "Sarah Carter",
year = "2017",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1007/s10728-016-0320-8",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "338--353",
journal = "Health Care Analysis",
issn = "1065-3058",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Could Moral Enhancement Interventions be Medically Indicated?

AU - Carter, Sarah

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - This paper explores the position that moral enhancement interventionscould be medically indicated (and so considered therapeutic) in cases where theyprovide a remedy for a lack of empathy, when such a deficit is considered pathological.In order to argue this claim, the question as to whether a deficit of empathycould be considered to be pathological is examined, taking into account the difficulty of defining illness and disorder generally, and especially in the case of mental health. Following this, Psychopathy and a fictionalised mental disorder (Moral Deficiency Disorder) are explored with a view to consider moral enhancement techniques as possible treatments for both conditions. At this juncture, having asserted and defended the position that moral enhancement interventions could, under certain circumstances, be considered medically indicated, this paper then goes on to briefly explore some of the consequences of this assertion. First, it is acknowledged that this broadening of diagnostic criteria in light of new interventions could fall foul of claims of medicalisation. It is then briefly noted that considering moral enhancement technologies to be akin to therapies in certain circumstances could lead to ethical and legal consequences and questions, such as those regarding regulation, access, and even consent.

AB - This paper explores the position that moral enhancement interventionscould be medically indicated (and so considered therapeutic) in cases where theyprovide a remedy for a lack of empathy, when such a deficit is considered pathological.In order to argue this claim, the question as to whether a deficit of empathycould be considered to be pathological is examined, taking into account the difficulty of defining illness and disorder generally, and especially in the case of mental health. Following this, Psychopathy and a fictionalised mental disorder (Moral Deficiency Disorder) are explored with a view to consider moral enhancement techniques as possible treatments for both conditions. At this juncture, having asserted and defended the position that moral enhancement interventions could, under certain circumstances, be considered medically indicated, this paper then goes on to briefly explore some of the consequences of this assertion. First, it is acknowledged that this broadening of diagnostic criteria in light of new interventions could fall foul of claims of medicalisation. It is then briefly noted that considering moral enhancement technologies to be akin to therapies in certain circumstances could lead to ethical and legal consequences and questions, such as those regarding regulation, access, and even consent.

KW - Moral enhancement

KW - Bioethics

KW - Neuroethics

KW - Moral therapy

KW - Empathy

KW - Enhancement

U2 - 10.1007/s10728-016-0320-8

DO - 10.1007/s10728-016-0320-8

M3 - Journal article

VL - 25

SP - 338

EP - 353

JO - Health Care Analysis

JF - Health Care Analysis

SN - 1065-3058

IS - 4

ER -