Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Cycling into Headwinds

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Cycling into Headwinds: Analysing mobility practices that inhibit sustainability

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Cycling into Headwinds: Analysing mobility practices that inhibit sustainability. / Scheurenbrand, Klara; Parsons, Elizabeth; Cappellini, Benedetta et al.
In: Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 37, No. 2, 01.11.2018, p. 227-244.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Scheurenbrand, K, Parsons, E, Cappellini, B & Patterson, A 2018, 'Cycling into Headwinds: Analysing mobility practices that inhibit sustainability', Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 227-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915618810440

APA

Scheurenbrand, K., Parsons, E., Cappellini, B., & Patterson, A. (2018). Cycling into Headwinds: Analysing mobility practices that inhibit sustainability. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 37(2), 227-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915618810440

Vancouver

Scheurenbrand K, Parsons E, Cappellini B, Patterson A. Cycling into Headwinds: Analysing mobility practices that inhibit sustainability. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing. 2018 Nov 1;37(2):227-244. doi: 10.1177/0743915618810440

Author

Scheurenbrand, Klara ; Parsons, Elizabeth ; Cappellini, Benedetta et al. / Cycling into Headwinds : Analysing mobility practices that inhibit sustainability. In: Journal of Public Policy and Marketing. 2018 ; Vol. 37, No. 2. pp. 227-244.

Bibtex

@article{bbc72f840c264a39afcf45cd20a8b3f0,
title = "Cycling into Headwinds: Analysing mobility practices that inhibit sustainability",
abstract = "Using the example of cycling, the authors contribute to public policy debates surrounding sustainability. They employ practice theory to shift the debate away from consumer choice and agency to examine instead why sustainable practices are not always available to consumers. Therefore, rather than asking, “Why don{\textquoteright}t people cycle?” the authors ask, “Why isn{\textquoteright}t the practice of cycling thriving?” Practice theory focuses on material, meanings, and competences as the components of a practice, positing that a practice can thrive and grow only when these elements come together. By looking at how practices compete for the same set of elements, the authors demonstrate how some practices (e.g. driving, schooling, policing) come to dominate or inhibit others (i.e., cycling). In terms of the theme of this special issue, then, instead of excavating anticonsumption as a precursor to practices (i.e., a choice not to engage in those practices), by unpacking practices, the authors examine the mechanisms through which this choice is restricted.",
keywords = "cycling, policy, practice theory, practice, sustainable consumption, anticonsumption",
author = "Klara Scheurenbrand and Elizabeth Parsons and Benedetta Cappellini and Anthony Patterson",
year = "2018",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0743915618810440",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "227--244",
journal = "Journal of Public Policy and Marketing",
issn = "0743-9156",
publisher = "American Marketing Association",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cycling into Headwinds

T2 - Analysing mobility practices that inhibit sustainability

AU - Scheurenbrand, Klara

AU - Parsons, Elizabeth

AU - Cappellini, Benedetta

AU - Patterson, Anthony

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Using the example of cycling, the authors contribute to public policy debates surrounding sustainability. They employ practice theory to shift the debate away from consumer choice and agency to examine instead why sustainable practices are not always available to consumers. Therefore, rather than asking, “Why don’t people cycle?” the authors ask, “Why isn’t the practice of cycling thriving?” Practice theory focuses on material, meanings, and competences as the components of a practice, positing that a practice can thrive and grow only when these elements come together. By looking at how practices compete for the same set of elements, the authors demonstrate how some practices (e.g. driving, schooling, policing) come to dominate or inhibit others (i.e., cycling). In terms of the theme of this special issue, then, instead of excavating anticonsumption as a precursor to practices (i.e., a choice not to engage in those practices), by unpacking practices, the authors examine the mechanisms through which this choice is restricted.

AB - Using the example of cycling, the authors contribute to public policy debates surrounding sustainability. They employ practice theory to shift the debate away from consumer choice and agency to examine instead why sustainable practices are not always available to consumers. Therefore, rather than asking, “Why don’t people cycle?” the authors ask, “Why isn’t the practice of cycling thriving?” Practice theory focuses on material, meanings, and competences as the components of a practice, positing that a practice can thrive and grow only when these elements come together. By looking at how practices compete for the same set of elements, the authors demonstrate how some practices (e.g. driving, schooling, policing) come to dominate or inhibit others (i.e., cycling). In terms of the theme of this special issue, then, instead of excavating anticonsumption as a precursor to practices (i.e., a choice not to engage in those practices), by unpacking practices, the authors examine the mechanisms through which this choice is restricted.

KW - cycling

KW - policy

KW - practice theory

KW - practice

KW - sustainable consumption

KW - anticonsumption

U2 - 10.1177/0743915618810440

DO - 10.1177/0743915618810440

M3 - Journal article

VL - 37

SP - 227

EP - 244

JO - Journal of Public Policy and Marketing

JF - Journal of Public Policy and Marketing

SN - 0743-9156

IS - 2

ER -