Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Delivery of cognitive-behaviour therapy for psy...

Electronic data

  • AAM

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Mental Health on 22/12/2017, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09638237.2017.1417549

    Accepted author manuscript, 329 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Delivery of cognitive-behaviour therapy for psychosis: a service user preference trial

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • Gillian Haddock
  • Katherine Berry
  • Gabriel Davies
  • Graham Dunn
  • Kamelia Harris
  • Samantha Hartley
  • Fiona Holland
  • James Andrew Kelly
  • Heather Law
  • Anthony P. Morrison
  • John Mulligan
  • Sandra T. Neil
  • Liz Pitt
  • Zoe Rivers
  • Christopher, D. J. Taylor
  • Rachel Wass
  • Mary Welford
  • Sarah Woodward
  • Christine Barrowclough
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/07/2018
<mark>Journal</mark>Journal of Mental Health
Issue number4
Volume27
Number of pages9
Pages (from-to)336-344
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date22/12/17
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Background: Clinical guidelines recommend cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for people with psychosis, however, implementation is poor and not everyone wishes to engage with therapy. Understanding service user (SU) preferences for receiving such treatments is a priority for services.

Aims: To explore SU preferences and outcomes of different methods of delivering CBT for psychosis.

Method: SUs experiencing psychosis could choose between treatment as usual (TAU); TAU plus telephone-delivered CBT with self-help, CBT recovery manual (TS); high support CBT (HS – TAU plus TS plus group sessions) or randomisation. Participants received their option of choice and were followed-up on several outcomes over 9 and 15 months.

Results: Of 89 people recruited, three chose to be randomised and 86 expressed a treatment preference (32 chose TAU, 34 chose TS, 23 chose HS). There were few differences between those who chose therapy compared to those who chose TAU. Those who had more positive impacts from their symptoms were significantly more likely to choose TAU.

Conclusions: Most people had strong preferences about treatment delivery and a substantial number did not wish to receive additional therapy. These findings have to be considered when planning and allocating resources for people with psychosis.

Bibliographic note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Mental Health on 22/12/2017, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09638237.2017.1417549