Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Delivery of cognitive-behaviour therapy for psy...

Electronic data

  • AAM

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Mental Health on 22/12/2017, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09638237.2017.1417549

    Accepted author manuscript, 329 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Delivery of cognitive-behaviour therapy for psychosis: a service user preference trial

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Delivery of cognitive-behaviour therapy for psychosis: a service user preference trial. / Haddock, Gillian; Berry, Katherine; Davies, Gabriel et al.
In: Journal of Mental Health, Vol. 27, No. 4, 01.07.2018, p. 336-344.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Haddock, G, Berry, K, Davies, G, Dunn, G, Harris, K, Hartley, S, Holland, F, Kelly, JA, Law, H, Morrison, AP, Mulligan, J, Neil, ST, Pitt, L, Rivers, Z, Taylor, CDJ, Wass, R, Welford, M, Woodward, S & Barrowclough, C 2018, 'Delivery of cognitive-behaviour therapy for psychosis: a service user preference trial', Journal of Mental Health, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 336-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2017.1417549

APA

Haddock, G., Berry, K., Davies, G., Dunn, G., Harris, K., Hartley, S., Holland, F., Kelly, J. A., Law, H., Morrison, A. P., Mulligan, J., Neil, S. T., Pitt, L., Rivers, Z., Taylor, C. D. J., Wass, R., Welford, M., Woodward, S., & Barrowclough, C. (2018). Delivery of cognitive-behaviour therapy for psychosis: a service user preference trial. Journal of Mental Health, 27(4), 336-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2017.1417549

Vancouver

Haddock G, Berry K, Davies G, Dunn G, Harris K, Hartley S et al. Delivery of cognitive-behaviour therapy for psychosis: a service user preference trial. Journal of Mental Health. 2018 Jul 1;27(4):336-344. Epub 2017 Dec 22. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1417549

Author

Haddock, Gillian ; Berry, Katherine ; Davies, Gabriel et al. / Delivery of cognitive-behaviour therapy for psychosis : a service user preference trial. In: Journal of Mental Health. 2018 ; Vol. 27, No. 4. pp. 336-344.

Bibtex

@article{68dd0e34fade4dd8893a5700826c45fb,
title = "Delivery of cognitive-behaviour therapy for psychosis: a service user preference trial",
abstract = "Background: Clinical guidelines recommend cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for people with psychosis, however, implementation is poor and not everyone wishes to engage with therapy. Understanding service user (SU) preferences for receiving such treatments is a priority for services.Aims: To explore SU preferences and outcomes of different methods of delivering CBT for psychosis.Method: SUs experiencing psychosis could choose between treatment as usual (TAU); TAU plus telephone-delivered CBT with self-help, CBT recovery manual (TS); high support CBT (HS – TAU plus TS plus group sessions) or randomisation. Participants received their option of choice and were followed-up on several outcomes over 9 and 15 months.Results: Of 89 people recruited, three chose to be randomised and 86 expressed a treatment preference (32 chose TAU, 34 chose TS, 23 chose HS). There were few differences between those who chose therapy compared to those who chose TAU. Those who had more positive impacts from their symptoms were significantly more likely to choose TAU.Conclusions: Most people had strong preferences about treatment delivery and a substantial number did not wish to receive additional therapy. These findings have to be considered when planning and allocating resources for people with psychosis.",
author = "Gillian Haddock and Katherine Berry and Gabriel Davies and Graham Dunn and Kamelia Harris and Samantha Hartley and Fiona Holland and Kelly, {James Andrew} and Heather Law and Morrison, {Anthony P.} and John Mulligan and Neil, {Sandra T.} and Liz Pitt and Zoe Rivers and Taylor, {Christopher, D. J.} and Rachel Wass and Mary Welford and Sarah Woodward and Christine Barrowclough",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Mental Health on 22/12/2017, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09638237.2017.1417549",
year = "2018",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09638237.2017.1417549",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "336--344",
journal = "Journal of Mental Health",
issn = "0963-8237",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Delivery of cognitive-behaviour therapy for psychosis

T2 - a service user preference trial

AU - Haddock, Gillian

AU - Berry, Katherine

AU - Davies, Gabriel

AU - Dunn, Graham

AU - Harris, Kamelia

AU - Hartley, Samantha

AU - Holland, Fiona

AU - Kelly, James Andrew

AU - Law, Heather

AU - Morrison, Anthony P.

AU - Mulligan, John

AU - Neil, Sandra T.

AU - Pitt, Liz

AU - Rivers, Zoe

AU - Taylor, Christopher, D. J.

AU - Wass, Rachel

AU - Welford, Mary

AU - Woodward, Sarah

AU - Barrowclough, Christine

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Mental Health on 22/12/2017, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09638237.2017.1417549

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Background: Clinical guidelines recommend cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for people with psychosis, however, implementation is poor and not everyone wishes to engage with therapy. Understanding service user (SU) preferences for receiving such treatments is a priority for services.Aims: To explore SU preferences and outcomes of different methods of delivering CBT for psychosis.Method: SUs experiencing psychosis could choose between treatment as usual (TAU); TAU plus telephone-delivered CBT with self-help, CBT recovery manual (TS); high support CBT (HS – TAU plus TS plus group sessions) or randomisation. Participants received their option of choice and were followed-up on several outcomes over 9 and 15 months.Results: Of 89 people recruited, three chose to be randomised and 86 expressed a treatment preference (32 chose TAU, 34 chose TS, 23 chose HS). There were few differences between those who chose therapy compared to those who chose TAU. Those who had more positive impacts from their symptoms were significantly more likely to choose TAU.Conclusions: Most people had strong preferences about treatment delivery and a substantial number did not wish to receive additional therapy. These findings have to be considered when planning and allocating resources for people with psychosis.

AB - Background: Clinical guidelines recommend cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for people with psychosis, however, implementation is poor and not everyone wishes to engage with therapy. Understanding service user (SU) preferences for receiving such treatments is a priority for services.Aims: To explore SU preferences and outcomes of different methods of delivering CBT for psychosis.Method: SUs experiencing psychosis could choose between treatment as usual (TAU); TAU plus telephone-delivered CBT with self-help, CBT recovery manual (TS); high support CBT (HS – TAU plus TS plus group sessions) or randomisation. Participants received their option of choice and were followed-up on several outcomes over 9 and 15 months.Results: Of 89 people recruited, three chose to be randomised and 86 expressed a treatment preference (32 chose TAU, 34 chose TS, 23 chose HS). There were few differences between those who chose therapy compared to those who chose TAU. Those who had more positive impacts from their symptoms were significantly more likely to choose TAU.Conclusions: Most people had strong preferences about treatment delivery and a substantial number did not wish to receive additional therapy. These findings have to be considered when planning and allocating resources for people with psychosis.

U2 - 10.1080/09638237.2017.1417549

DO - 10.1080/09638237.2017.1417549

M3 - Journal article

VL - 27

SP - 336

EP - 344

JO - Journal of Mental Health

JF - Journal of Mental Health

SN - 0963-8237

IS - 4

ER -