Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Developing Measures of Severity and Frequency o...

Electronic data

View graph of relations

Developing Measures of Severity and Frequency of Reconviction

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@techreport{2e9f9c6b9f544ac9914598b6d7262973,
title = "Developing Measures of Severity and Frequency of Reconviction",
abstract = "This report examines the scope for focusing on the seriousness and frequency of recidivism and presents methodology for determining how to measure offence seriousness, and how to measure frequency of offending. It also discusses the advantages and disadvantages of combining these two measures into a combined seriousness/frequency score. However, one needs to recognise that the task of providing alternative measures of recidivism is not simply a technical exercise, for there are both philosophical and practical issues to confront.Hence, while the main body of the report focuses largely on the feasibility of producing the alternative measures and provides some solid evidence of developing these approaches (sections 3-5), the philosophical issues – which embrace definitional, conceptual and moral concerns – are not overlooked (see section 2). Furthermore, some of the practical issues of introducing these measures are recognised in the final section (section 6). First, however, what are the stated aims and objectives of the work.",
author = "Brian Francis and Keith Soothill and Leslie Humphreys and {Cutajar Bezzina}, Audrienne",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Developing Measures of Severity and Frequency of Reconviction

AU - Francis, Brian

AU - Soothill, Keith

AU - Humphreys, Leslie

AU - Cutajar Bezzina, Audrienne

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - This report examines the scope for focusing on the seriousness and frequency of recidivism and presents methodology for determining how to measure offence seriousness, and how to measure frequency of offending. It also discusses the advantages and disadvantages of combining these two measures into a combined seriousness/frequency score. However, one needs to recognise that the task of providing alternative measures of recidivism is not simply a technical exercise, for there are both philosophical and practical issues to confront.Hence, while the main body of the report focuses largely on the feasibility of producing the alternative measures and provides some solid evidence of developing these approaches (sections 3-5), the philosophical issues – which embrace definitional, conceptual and moral concerns – are not overlooked (see section 2). Furthermore, some of the practical issues of introducing these measures are recognised in the final section (section 6). First, however, what are the stated aims and objectives of the work.

AB - This report examines the scope for focusing on the seriousness and frequency of recidivism and presents methodology for determining how to measure offence seriousness, and how to measure frequency of offending. It also discusses the advantages and disadvantages of combining these two measures into a combined seriousness/frequency score. However, one needs to recognise that the task of providing alternative measures of recidivism is not simply a technical exercise, for there are both philosophical and practical issues to confront.Hence, while the main body of the report focuses largely on the feasibility of producing the alternative measures and provides some solid evidence of developing these approaches (sections 3-5), the philosophical issues – which embrace definitional, conceptual and moral concerns – are not overlooked (see section 2). Furthermore, some of the practical issues of introducing these measures are recognised in the final section (section 6). First, however, what are the stated aims and objectives of the work.

M3 - Working paper

BT - Developing Measures of Severity and Frequency of Reconviction

ER -