Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Exploring learner language through corpora

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Exploring learner language through corpora: comparing and interpreting corpus frequency information

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Exploring learner language through corpora: comparing and interpreting corpus frequency information. / Gablasova, Dana; Brezina, Vaclav; McEnery, Anthony Mark.
In: Language Learning, Vol. 67, No. Suppl. 1, 06.2017, p. 130-154.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Gablasova D, Brezina V, McEnery AM. Exploring learner language through corpora: comparing and interpreting corpus frequency information. Language Learning. 2017 Jun;67(Suppl. 1):130-154. Epub 2017 Mar 15. doi: 10.1111/lang.12226

Author

Bibtex

@article{76627641bb5547b89f0b54db7466b23e,
title = "Exploring learner language through corpora: comparing and interpreting corpus frequency information",
abstract = "This article contributes to the debate about the appropriate use of corpus data in language learning research. It focuses on frequencies of linguistic features in language use and their comparison across corpora. The majority of corpus-based second language acquisition studies employ a comparative design in which either one or more second language (L2) corpora are compared to a first language (L1) production corpus or two or more L2 corpora are compared to each other. This article critically examines some of the central tenets of the comparative method related to the interspeaker variation in L1 and L2 use, the representativeness and comparability of corpus data, the interpretation of difference found between corpora and the appropriate use of statistics. Using and discussing a set of five L1 spoken English corpora and three L2 English corpora (two spoken and one written), we approach these areas empirically exploring different sources of variations and methodological options that corpus-based SLA studies offer.",
author = "Dana Gablasova and Vaclav Brezina and McEnery, {Anthony Mark}",
year = "2017",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1111/lang.12226",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "130--154",
journal = "Language Learning",
issn = "0023-8333",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "Suppl. 1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring learner language through corpora

T2 - comparing and interpreting corpus frequency information

AU - Gablasova, Dana

AU - Brezina, Vaclav

AU - McEnery, Anthony Mark

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

N2 - This article contributes to the debate about the appropriate use of corpus data in language learning research. It focuses on frequencies of linguistic features in language use and their comparison across corpora. The majority of corpus-based second language acquisition studies employ a comparative design in which either one or more second language (L2) corpora are compared to a first language (L1) production corpus or two or more L2 corpora are compared to each other. This article critically examines some of the central tenets of the comparative method related to the interspeaker variation in L1 and L2 use, the representativeness and comparability of corpus data, the interpretation of difference found between corpora and the appropriate use of statistics. Using and discussing a set of five L1 spoken English corpora and three L2 English corpora (two spoken and one written), we approach these areas empirically exploring different sources of variations and methodological options that corpus-based SLA studies offer.

AB - This article contributes to the debate about the appropriate use of corpus data in language learning research. It focuses on frequencies of linguistic features in language use and their comparison across corpora. The majority of corpus-based second language acquisition studies employ a comparative design in which either one or more second language (L2) corpora are compared to a first language (L1) production corpus or two or more L2 corpora are compared to each other. This article critically examines some of the central tenets of the comparative method related to the interspeaker variation in L1 and L2 use, the representativeness and comparability of corpus data, the interpretation of difference found between corpora and the appropriate use of statistics. Using and discussing a set of five L1 spoken English corpora and three L2 English corpora (two spoken and one written), we approach these areas empirically exploring different sources of variations and methodological options that corpus-based SLA studies offer.

U2 - 10.1111/lang.12226

DO - 10.1111/lang.12226

M3 - Journal article

VL - 67

SP - 130

EP - 154

JO - Language Learning

JF - Language Learning

SN - 0023-8333

IS - Suppl. 1

ER -