Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Hans Kelsen's concept of normative imputation

Associated organisational unit

View graph of relations

Hans Kelsen's concept of normative imputation

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Hans Kelsen's concept of normative imputation. / Langford, Peter; Bryan, Ian.

In: Ratio Juris, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2013, p. 85-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

Langford, P & Bryan, I 2013, 'Hans Kelsen's concept of normative imputation' Ratio Juris, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 85-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12004

APA

Vancouver

Author

Langford, Peter ; Bryan, Ian. / Hans Kelsen's concept of normative imputation. In: Ratio Juris. 2013 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 85-110.

Bibtex

@article{b0ceaf4f2c5442bc875d0e1bbb69bcf2,
title = "Hans Kelsen's concept of normative imputation",
abstract = "This article compares and contrasts Hans Kelsen's concept of normative imputation, in the Lecture Course of 1926, with the concepts of peripheral and central imputation, in The Pure Theory of Law of 1934. In this process, a wider and more significant distinction is revealed within the development of Hans Kelsen's theory of positive law. This distinction represents a shift in Kelsen's philosophical allegiance from the Neo-Kantianism of Windelband to that of Cohen. This, in turn, reflects a broader disengagement of The Pure Theory of Law from the more direct connection with a political project of a civitas maxima envisaged by the Lecture Course.",
author = "Peter Langford and Ian Bryan",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1111/raju.12004",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "85--110",
journal = "Ratio Juris",
issn = "0952-1917",
publisher = "Basil Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hans Kelsen's concept of normative imputation

AU - Langford, Peter

AU - Bryan, Ian

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This article compares and contrasts Hans Kelsen's concept of normative imputation, in the Lecture Course of 1926, with the concepts of peripheral and central imputation, in The Pure Theory of Law of 1934. In this process, a wider and more significant distinction is revealed within the development of Hans Kelsen's theory of positive law. This distinction represents a shift in Kelsen's philosophical allegiance from the Neo-Kantianism of Windelband to that of Cohen. This, in turn, reflects a broader disengagement of The Pure Theory of Law from the more direct connection with a political project of a civitas maxima envisaged by the Lecture Course.

AB - This article compares and contrasts Hans Kelsen's concept of normative imputation, in the Lecture Course of 1926, with the concepts of peripheral and central imputation, in The Pure Theory of Law of 1934. In this process, a wider and more significant distinction is revealed within the development of Hans Kelsen's theory of positive law. This distinction represents a shift in Kelsen's philosophical allegiance from the Neo-Kantianism of Windelband to that of Cohen. This, in turn, reflects a broader disengagement of The Pure Theory of Law from the more direct connection with a political project of a civitas maxima envisaged by the Lecture Course.

U2 - 10.1111/raju.12004

DO - 10.1111/raju.12004

M3 - Journal article

VL - 26

SP - 85

EP - 110

JO - Ratio Juris

JF - Ratio Juris

SN - 0952-1917

IS - 1

ER -