Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Harmonising conflicts between science, regulati...
View graph of relations

Harmonising conflicts between science, regulation, perception and environmental impact: the case of soil conditioners from bioenergy

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{d7fd9286ecdf495595eef6751c1a6e8f,
title = "Harmonising conflicts between science, regulation, perception and environmental impact: the case of soil conditioners from bioenergy",
abstract = "As the global population is expected to reach 9 billion by 2050, humanity needs to balance an ever increasing demand for food, energy and natural resources, with sustainable management of ecosystems and the vital services that they provide. The intensification of agriculture, including the use of fertilisers from finite sources, has resulted in extensive soil degradation, which has increased food production costs and CO2 emissions, threatening food security. The Bioenergy sector has significant potential to contribute to the formation of a circular economy. This paper presents the scientific, regulatory and socioeconomic barriers to the use of the nutrient waste streams from biomass thermal conversion (ash) and anaerobic digestion (digestate) as sustainable soil amendments for use in place of traditional fertilisers. It is argued that whilst the ability of combined ash and digestate to remedy many threats to ecosystems and provide a market to incentivise the renewable bio-energy schemes is promising, a step-change is required to alter perceptions of 'waste', from an expensive problem, to a product with environmental and economic value. This can only be achieved by well-informed interactions between scientists, regulators and end users, to improve the spread and speed of innovation with this sector.",
keywords = "Digestate, Biomass ash , Soil conditioner , Environmental impact , Ecosystems , Regulation",
author = "Riding, {Matthew J.} and Herbert, {Ben M. J.} and Lois Ricketts and Ian Dodd and Nick Ostle and Semple, {Kirk T.}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.025",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "52--67",
journal = "Environment International",
issn = "0160-4120",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Harmonising conflicts between science, regulation, perception and environmental impact

T2 - the case of soil conditioners from bioenergy

AU - Riding, Matthew J.

AU - Herbert, Ben M. J.

AU - Ricketts, Lois

AU - Dodd, Ian

AU - Ostle, Nick

AU - Semple, Kirk T.

PY - 2015/2

Y1 - 2015/2

N2 - As the global population is expected to reach 9 billion by 2050, humanity needs to balance an ever increasing demand for food, energy and natural resources, with sustainable management of ecosystems and the vital services that they provide. The intensification of agriculture, including the use of fertilisers from finite sources, has resulted in extensive soil degradation, which has increased food production costs and CO2 emissions, threatening food security. The Bioenergy sector has significant potential to contribute to the formation of a circular economy. This paper presents the scientific, regulatory and socioeconomic barriers to the use of the nutrient waste streams from biomass thermal conversion (ash) and anaerobic digestion (digestate) as sustainable soil amendments for use in place of traditional fertilisers. It is argued that whilst the ability of combined ash and digestate to remedy many threats to ecosystems and provide a market to incentivise the renewable bio-energy schemes is promising, a step-change is required to alter perceptions of 'waste', from an expensive problem, to a product with environmental and economic value. This can only be achieved by well-informed interactions between scientists, regulators and end users, to improve the spread and speed of innovation with this sector.

AB - As the global population is expected to reach 9 billion by 2050, humanity needs to balance an ever increasing demand for food, energy and natural resources, with sustainable management of ecosystems and the vital services that they provide. The intensification of agriculture, including the use of fertilisers from finite sources, has resulted in extensive soil degradation, which has increased food production costs and CO2 emissions, threatening food security. The Bioenergy sector has significant potential to contribute to the formation of a circular economy. This paper presents the scientific, regulatory and socioeconomic barriers to the use of the nutrient waste streams from biomass thermal conversion (ash) and anaerobic digestion (digestate) as sustainable soil amendments for use in place of traditional fertilisers. It is argued that whilst the ability of combined ash and digestate to remedy many threats to ecosystems and provide a market to incentivise the renewable bio-energy schemes is promising, a step-change is required to alter perceptions of 'waste', from an expensive problem, to a product with environmental and economic value. This can only be achieved by well-informed interactions between scientists, regulators and end users, to improve the spread and speed of innovation with this sector.

KW - Digestate

KW - Biomass ash

KW - Soil conditioner

KW - Environmental impact

KW - Ecosystems

KW - Regulation

U2 - 10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.025

DO - 10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.025

M3 - Journal article

VL - 75

SP - 52

EP - 67

JO - Environment International

JF - Environment International

SN - 0160-4120

ER -