We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK
94% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating
How Do Body Diagrams Affect the Accuracy and Consistency of Children's Reports of Bodily Touch Across Repeated Interviews?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article
Published
| Journal publication date | 03/2012 |
|---|---|
| Journal | Applied Cognitive Psychology |
| Journal number | 2 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Pages | 174-181 |
| Original language | English |
Abstract
We examined the amount, accuracy, and consistency of information reported by 58 5- to 7-year-old children about a staged event that included physical contact/touching. Both 1 and 7months following the event, children were asked both open and yes/no questions about touch [i] when provided with human body diagrams (HBDs), [ii] following instruction and practice using the HBDs, or [iii] without HBDs. Children interviewed with HBDs reported more information at 7months, but a high proportion of inaccurate touches. Children seldom repeated touch-related information across the two interviews and did not incorporate errors made in the 1-month interview into their open-ended accounts 6months later. Asking children to talk about innocuous touch may lead them to report unreliable information, especially when HBDs are used as aids and repeated interviews are conducted across delays that resemble those typical of forensic contexts.