Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > How Do Body Diagrams Affect the Accuracy and Co...

Research

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

How Do Body Diagrams Affect the Accuracy and Consistency of Children's Reports of Bodily Touch Across Repeated Interviews?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

How Do Body Diagrams Affect the Accuracy and Consistency of Children's Reports of Bodily Touch Across Repeated Interviews? / Brown, Deirdre; Pipe, Margaret-Ellen; Lewis, Charlie et al.

In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 2, 03.2012, p. 174-181.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Brown, D, Pipe, M-E, Lewis, C, Lamb, ME & Orbach, Y 2012, 'How Do Body Diagrams Affect the Accuracy and Consistency of Children's Reports of Bodily Touch Across Repeated Interviews?', Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 174-181. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1828

APA

Brown, D., Pipe, M-E., Lewis, C., Lamb, M. E., & Orbach, Y. (2012). How Do Body Diagrams Affect the Accuracy and Consistency of Children's Reports of Bodily Touch Across Repeated Interviews? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(2), 174-181. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1828

Vancouver

Brown D, Pipe M-E, Lewis C, Lamb ME, Orbach Y. How Do Body Diagrams Affect the Accuracy and Consistency of Children's Reports of Bodily Touch Across Repeated Interviews? Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2012 Mar;26(2):174-181. doi: 10.1002/acp.1828

Author

Brown, Deirdre ; Pipe, Margaret-Ellen ; Lewis, Charlie et al. / How Do Body Diagrams Affect the Accuracy and Consistency of Children's Reports of Bodily Touch Across Repeated Interviews?. In: Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2012 ; Vol. 26, No. 2. pp. 174-181.

Bibtex

@article{6784c87b665d4d1281abcf3c8b23e1ef,
title = "How Do Body Diagrams Affect the Accuracy and Consistency of Children's Reports of Bodily Touch Across Repeated Interviews?",
abstract = "We examined the amount, accuracy, and consistency of information reported by 58 5- to 7-year-old children about a staged event that included physical contact/touching. Both 1 and 7months following the event, children were asked both open and yes/no questions about touch [i] when provided with human body diagrams (HBDs), [ii] following instruction and practice using the HBDs, or [iii] without HBDs. Children interviewed with HBDs reported more information at 7months, but a high proportion of inaccurate touches. Children seldom repeated touch-related information across the two interviews and did not incorporate errors made in the 1-month interview into their open-ended accounts 6months later. Asking children to talk about innocuous touch may lead them to report unreliable information, especially when HBDs are used as aids and repeated interviews are conducted across delays that resemble those typical of forensic contexts. ",
author = "Deirdre Brown and Margaret-Ellen Pipe and Charlie Lewis and Lamb, {Michael E.} and Yael Orbach",
year = "2012",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1002/acp.1828",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "174--181",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0888-4080",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Do Body Diagrams Affect the Accuracy and Consistency of Children's Reports of Bodily Touch Across Repeated Interviews?

AU - Brown, Deirdre

AU - Pipe, Margaret-Ellen

AU - Lewis, Charlie

AU - Lamb, Michael E.

AU - Orbach, Yael

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - We examined the amount, accuracy, and consistency of information reported by 58 5- to 7-year-old children about a staged event that included physical contact/touching. Both 1 and 7months following the event, children were asked both open and yes/no questions about touch [i] when provided with human body diagrams (HBDs), [ii] following instruction and practice using the HBDs, or [iii] without HBDs. Children interviewed with HBDs reported more information at 7months, but a high proportion of inaccurate touches. Children seldom repeated touch-related information across the two interviews and did not incorporate errors made in the 1-month interview into their open-ended accounts 6months later. Asking children to talk about innocuous touch may lead them to report unreliable information, especially when HBDs are used as aids and repeated interviews are conducted across delays that resemble those typical of forensic contexts. 

AB - We examined the amount, accuracy, and consistency of information reported by 58 5- to 7-year-old children about a staged event that included physical contact/touching. Both 1 and 7months following the event, children were asked both open and yes/no questions about touch [i] when provided with human body diagrams (HBDs), [ii] following instruction and practice using the HBDs, or [iii] without HBDs. Children interviewed with HBDs reported more information at 7months, but a high proportion of inaccurate touches. Children seldom repeated touch-related information across the two interviews and did not incorporate errors made in the 1-month interview into their open-ended accounts 6months later. Asking children to talk about innocuous touch may lead them to report unreliable information, especially when HBDs are used as aids and repeated interviews are conducted across delays that resemble those typical of forensic contexts. 

U2 - 10.1002/acp.1828

DO - 10.1002/acp.1828

M3 - Journal article

VL - 26

SP - 174

EP - 181

JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0888-4080

IS - 2

ER -