Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Imaginative labour and relationships of care
View graph of relations

Imaginative labour and relationships of care: co-designing prototypes with vulnerable communities

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Imaginative labour and relationships of care: co-designing prototypes with vulnerable communities. / Southern, Jen; Ellis, Rebecca; Ferrario, Maria Angela et al.
In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 84, 05.2014, p. 131-142.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Southern J, Ellis R, Ferrario MA, McNally R, Dillon R, Simm W et al. Imaginative labour and relationships of care: co-designing prototypes with vulnerable communities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2014 May;84:131-142. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.003

Author

Bibtex

@article{30552fc7aa61455b85d2ea4f1e476038,
title = "Imaginative labour and relationships of care: co-designing prototypes with vulnerable communities",
abstract = "Science-fiction prototyping is often used to explore the social implications of science and technology and to provide inspiration for innovation. The future that is being imagined however often exhibits a form of techno-optimism. This paper critiques that optimism by describing the #Patchworks project in which science fiction prototypes were used to explore the social implications of who does the imagining. Through our vignette we explore how the promissory nature of science fiction prototyping folds back into the present to change current understandings of real life situations. We suggest that the power to imagine and invent futures is often not extended to vulnerable communities, nor does it take into account the differing authority and agency depending on who is telling and who feels able to tell stories. The collision between these different stories and backgrounds in #Patchworks, the co-design project informing this paper, has produced contradictions and negotiations between the speculative practice of 'tinkering' used by DIY hackers that act as 'openings', an academic focus on innovation and the 'anchoring' inherent in the need to produce practical prototypes that solve urgent problems. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Science fiction prototyping, Innovation, Future imaginaries, Community, Co-design, Foresight, INNOVATION, LIMITS",
author = "Jen Southern and Rebecca Ellis and Ferrario, {Maria Angela} and Ruth McNally and Rod Dillon and Will Simm and Jon Whittle",
year = "2014",
month = may,
doi = "10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.003",
language = "English",
volume = "84",
pages = "131--142",
journal = "Technological Forecasting and Social Change",
issn = "0040-1625",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaginative labour and relationships of care

T2 - co-designing prototypes with vulnerable communities

AU - Southern, Jen

AU - Ellis, Rebecca

AU - Ferrario, Maria Angela

AU - McNally, Ruth

AU - Dillon, Rod

AU - Simm, Will

AU - Whittle, Jon

PY - 2014/5

Y1 - 2014/5

N2 - Science-fiction prototyping is often used to explore the social implications of science and technology and to provide inspiration for innovation. The future that is being imagined however often exhibits a form of techno-optimism. This paper critiques that optimism by describing the #Patchworks project in which science fiction prototypes were used to explore the social implications of who does the imagining. Through our vignette we explore how the promissory nature of science fiction prototyping folds back into the present to change current understandings of real life situations. We suggest that the power to imagine and invent futures is often not extended to vulnerable communities, nor does it take into account the differing authority and agency depending on who is telling and who feels able to tell stories. The collision between these different stories and backgrounds in #Patchworks, the co-design project informing this paper, has produced contradictions and negotiations between the speculative practice of 'tinkering' used by DIY hackers that act as 'openings', an academic focus on innovation and the 'anchoring' inherent in the need to produce practical prototypes that solve urgent problems. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

AB - Science-fiction prototyping is often used to explore the social implications of science and technology and to provide inspiration for innovation. The future that is being imagined however often exhibits a form of techno-optimism. This paper critiques that optimism by describing the #Patchworks project in which science fiction prototypes were used to explore the social implications of who does the imagining. Through our vignette we explore how the promissory nature of science fiction prototyping folds back into the present to change current understandings of real life situations. We suggest that the power to imagine and invent futures is often not extended to vulnerable communities, nor does it take into account the differing authority and agency depending on who is telling and who feels able to tell stories. The collision between these different stories and backgrounds in #Patchworks, the co-design project informing this paper, has produced contradictions and negotiations between the speculative practice of 'tinkering' used by DIY hackers that act as 'openings', an academic focus on innovation and the 'anchoring' inherent in the need to produce practical prototypes that solve urgent problems. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

KW - Science fiction prototyping

KW - Innovation

KW - Future imaginaries

KW - Community

KW - Co-design

KW - Foresight

KW - INNOVATION

KW - LIMITS

U2 - 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.003

M3 - Journal article

VL - 84

SP - 131

EP - 142

JO - Technological Forecasting and Social Change

JF - Technological Forecasting and Social Change

SN - 0040-1625

ER -