Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Imaginative labour and relationships of care
T2 - co-designing prototypes with vulnerable communities
AU - Southern, Jen
AU - Ellis, Rebecca
AU - Ferrario, Maria Angela
AU - McNally, Ruth
AU - Dillon, Rod
AU - Simm, Will
AU - Whittle, Jon
PY - 2014/5
Y1 - 2014/5
N2 - Science-fiction prototyping is often used to explore the social implications of science and technology and to provide inspiration for innovation. The future that is being imagined however often exhibits a form of techno-optimism. This paper critiques that optimism by describing the #Patchworks project in which science fiction prototypes were used to explore the social implications of who does the imagining. Through our vignette we explore how the promissory nature of science fiction prototyping folds back into the present to change current understandings of real life situations. We suggest that the power to imagine and invent futures is often not extended to vulnerable communities, nor does it take into account the differing authority and agency depending on who is telling and who feels able to tell stories. The collision between these different stories and backgrounds in #Patchworks, the co-design project informing this paper, has produced contradictions and negotiations between the speculative practice of 'tinkering' used by DIY hackers that act as 'openings', an academic focus on innovation and the 'anchoring' inherent in the need to produce practical prototypes that solve urgent problems. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
AB - Science-fiction prototyping is often used to explore the social implications of science and technology and to provide inspiration for innovation. The future that is being imagined however often exhibits a form of techno-optimism. This paper critiques that optimism by describing the #Patchworks project in which science fiction prototypes were used to explore the social implications of who does the imagining. Through our vignette we explore how the promissory nature of science fiction prototyping folds back into the present to change current understandings of real life situations. We suggest that the power to imagine and invent futures is often not extended to vulnerable communities, nor does it take into account the differing authority and agency depending on who is telling and who feels able to tell stories. The collision between these different stories and backgrounds in #Patchworks, the co-design project informing this paper, has produced contradictions and negotiations between the speculative practice of 'tinkering' used by DIY hackers that act as 'openings', an academic focus on innovation and the 'anchoring' inherent in the need to produce practical prototypes that solve urgent problems. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
KW - Science fiction prototyping
KW - Innovation
KW - Future imaginaries
KW - Community
KW - Co-design
KW - Foresight
KW - INNOVATION
KW - LIMITS
U2 - 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.003
DO - 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.003
M3 - Journal article
VL - 84
SP - 131
EP - 142
JO - Technological Forecasting and Social Change
JF - Technological Forecasting and Social Change
SN - 0040-1625
ER -