Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Inter-domain mobility with LISP-MN

Research

Associated organisational units

Electronic data

  • Inter-Domain Mobility with LISP-MN – A Performance Comparison with MIPv6

    Rights statement: ©2015 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.

    Accepted author manuscript, 936 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Inter-domain mobility with LISP-MN: a performance comparison with MIPv6

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review

Published
Publication date10/2015
Host publicationIFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC), 2015 8th
PublisherIEEE
Pages80-87
Number of pages8
ISBN (print)9781509003518
<mark>Original language</mark>English
EventWMNC 2015 : 8th IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference - Munich, Germany
Duration: 5/10/2015 → 7/10/2015

Conference

ConferenceWMNC 2015 : 8th IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference
Country/TerritoryGermany
CityMunich
Period5/10/15 → 7/10/15

Conference

ConferenceWMNC 2015 : 8th IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference
Country/TerritoryGermany
CityMunich
Period5/10/15 → 7/10/15

Abstract

In this work, we aim to evaluate Locator Identifier Separation Protocol-Mobile Node (LISP-MN) performance in an inter-domain mobility scenario for both multi-interface and single interface MN with focus on throughput, handover delay, service disruption time and packet loss. To serve as the benchmark for performance, we compare LISP-MN with the IETF standardised MIPv6. We implement the 2 protocols on a laboratory testbed comprising all the nodes necessary for their operation. For multi-interface MNs, LISP-MN shows a better response in soft handover scenarios in terms of throughput and packet loss. MIPv6 on the other hand shows shorter handover delay with lower service disruption time in a hard handover scenario. Both protocols demonstrate poor performance for a single interface MN due to the long handover delay experienced. Although LISP-MN’s handover control messages doubled that of MIPv6, our experiments show that it takes a similar time as MIPv6 to complete the handover message exchange.

Bibliographic note

©2015 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.