12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Interprofessional handover and patient safety i...
View graph of relations

« Back

Interprofessional handover and patient safety in anaesthesia : observational study of handovers in the recovery room.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Journal publication date09/2008
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Journal number3
Volume101
Number of pages6
Pages332-337
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Background: We aimed to describe how anaesthetists hand over information and professional responsibility to nurses in the operating theatre recovery room. Methods: We carried out non-participant practice observation and in-depth interviews with practitioners working in the recovery room of an English hospital and used qualitative methods to analyse the resulting transcripts. Results: We observed 45 handovers taking place between 17 anaesthetists and 15 nurses in the recovery room of the operating theatre suite. These took place in an environment that is event-driven, time-pressured, and prone to concurrent distractions. Anaesthetists and nurses often had differing expectations of the content and timing of information transfer. The point at which transfer of responsibility for the patient occurred during the handover process was variable and depended not only on the condition of the patient but also on the professional relationship between the nurse and doctor concerned. Handover also provided an ‘audit point’ in care where the patient’s intraoperative progress was reviewed and plans were made for further management. Here, as in the transfer of responsibility, we found evidence that nurses play a greater role in defining the limits of anaesthetists’ practice than might be expected. Conclusions: Patient handovers in the recovery room are largely informal, but nevertheless show many inherent tensions, both professional and organizational. Although formalized handover procedures are often advocated for the promotion of safety, we suggest that they are likely to work best when the informal elements, and the cultural factors underlying them, are acknowledged.

Related projects