Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Itô versus Stratonovich: 30 years later

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • ito-fnl8PostPrint

    Rights statement: Downgraded to postprint Electronic version of this article published as Itô versus Stratonovich: 30 years later in Fluctuation and Noise Letters 11, 1, 2012, 1240010 10.1142/S021947751240010X © [copyright World Scientific Publishing Company] http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S021947751240010X

    Accepted author manuscript, 135 KB, PDF-document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Itô versus Stratonovich: 30 years later

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
Article number1240010
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>03/2012
<mark>Journal</mark>Fluctuation and Noise Letters
Issue number1
Volume11
Number of pages10
Pages (from-to)-
<mark>State</mark>Published
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

The Ito versus Stratonovich controversy, about the "correct" calculus to use for integration of Langevin equations, was settled to general satisfaction some 30 years ago. Recently, however, it has started to re-emerge, following the advent of new experimental techniques. We briefly review the historical background and discuss critically some of the most recent contributions. We show that some of the new findings are not well based.

Bibliographic note

Electronic version of this article published as Itô versus Stratonovich: 30 years later in Fluctuation and Noise Letters 11, 1, 2012, 1240010 10.1142/S021947751240010X © [copyright World Scientific Publishing Company] http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S021947751240010X