Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > MORECare research methods guidance development

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

MORECare research methods guidance development: recommendations for statistical methods in palliative and end of life care research

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineMeeting abstractpeer-review

Published

Standard

MORECare research methods guidance development: recommendations for statistical methods in palliative and end of life care research. / Preston, Nancy; Grande, Gunn; Fayers, P. et al.
In: Palliative Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 4, OA42, 06.2012, p. 416-417.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineMeeting abstractpeer-review

Harvard

Preston, N, Grande, G, Fayers, P, Pilling, M, Higginson, IJ, Short, V, Anscombe, E, Evans, C & Benalia, H 2012, 'MORECare research methods guidance development: recommendations for statistical methods in palliative and end of life care research', Palliative Medicine, vol. 26, no. 4, OA42, pp. 416-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216312446391

APA

Preston, N., Grande, G., Fayers, P., Pilling, M., Higginson, I. J., Short, V., Anscombe, E., Evans, C., & Benalia, H. (2012). MORECare research methods guidance development: recommendations for statistical methods in palliative and end of life care research. Palliative Medicine, 26(4), 416-417. Article OA42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216312446391

Vancouver

Preston N, Grande G, Fayers P, Pilling M, Higginson IJ, Short V et al. MORECare research methods guidance development: recommendations for statistical methods in palliative and end of life care research. Palliative Medicine. 2012 Jun;26(4):416-417. OA42. doi: 10.1177/0269216312446391

Author

Preston, Nancy ; Grande, Gunn ; Fayers, P. et al. / MORECare research methods guidance development : recommendations for statistical methods in palliative and end of life care research. In: Palliative Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 416-417.

Bibtex

@article{3a5b40c9a53649f89bad263247dfcaaf,
title = "MORECare research methods guidance development: recommendations for statistical methods in palliative and end of life care research",
abstract = "Aims: To identify agreed best practice for statistical methodsin palliative and end of life (P&EoLC) research.Background: Carrying out statistical analysis in P&EoLCresearch can be problematic due to high levels of missingdata and attrition as patients{\textquoteright} disease progresses.Methods: We used the MORECare Transparent ExpertConsultation approach to conduct consultation workshopswith experts in statistical methods in P&EoLC research.Prior to workshops participants were sent overviews of pertinentissues in statistical methods in P&EoLC. Followingworkshop presentations and discussion, nominal grouptechniques were used to produce candidate recommendations.These were subsequently rated online by participatingexperts. Descriptive statistics were employed to permitanalysis of consensus and rated importance. Narrative commentswere collated.Results: The statistical methods expert workshop comprised20 participants making 19 recommendations. Therewas broad agreement across most recommendations, thetop 5 recommendations were:1. Types and amount of missing data should be reportedalong with imputation methods.2. Pattern of missing data should be investigated to informimputation method.3. A statistical analysis plan should be in place.4. A taxonomy should be devised to define types ofattrition.5. Use of transition questions and minimally important differenceapproach provides insight into response shift.Conclusions: When designing studies in P&EoLC it is recommendedthat high rates of attrition should not be seen asindicative of poor design and that a clear statistical analysisplan is in place to account for missing data and attrition. Moreresearch is required in statistical methods to assess theseareas but also develop the emerging area of response shift.",
keywords = "research methods",
author = "Nancy Preston and Gunn Grande and P. Fayers and M. Pilling and Higginson, {I. J.} and V. Short and E. Anscombe and C. Evans and H. Benalia",
year = "2012",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1177/0269216312446391",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "416--417",
journal = "Palliative Medicine",
issn = "0269-2163",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - MORECare research methods guidance development

T2 - recommendations for statistical methods in palliative and end of life care research

AU - Preston, Nancy

AU - Grande, Gunn

AU - Fayers, P.

AU - Pilling, M.

AU - Higginson, I. J.

AU - Short, V.

AU - Anscombe, E.

AU - Evans, C.

AU - Benalia, H.

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Aims: To identify agreed best practice for statistical methodsin palliative and end of life (P&EoLC) research.Background: Carrying out statistical analysis in P&EoLCresearch can be problematic due to high levels of missingdata and attrition as patients’ disease progresses.Methods: We used the MORECare Transparent ExpertConsultation approach to conduct consultation workshopswith experts in statistical methods in P&EoLC research.Prior to workshops participants were sent overviews of pertinentissues in statistical methods in P&EoLC. Followingworkshop presentations and discussion, nominal grouptechniques were used to produce candidate recommendations.These were subsequently rated online by participatingexperts. Descriptive statistics were employed to permitanalysis of consensus and rated importance. Narrative commentswere collated.Results: The statistical methods expert workshop comprised20 participants making 19 recommendations. Therewas broad agreement across most recommendations, thetop 5 recommendations were:1. Types and amount of missing data should be reportedalong with imputation methods.2. Pattern of missing data should be investigated to informimputation method.3. A statistical analysis plan should be in place.4. A taxonomy should be devised to define types ofattrition.5. Use of transition questions and minimally important differenceapproach provides insight into response shift.Conclusions: When designing studies in P&EoLC it is recommendedthat high rates of attrition should not be seen asindicative of poor design and that a clear statistical analysisplan is in place to account for missing data and attrition. Moreresearch is required in statistical methods to assess theseareas but also develop the emerging area of response shift.

AB - Aims: To identify agreed best practice for statistical methodsin palliative and end of life (P&EoLC) research.Background: Carrying out statistical analysis in P&EoLCresearch can be problematic due to high levels of missingdata and attrition as patients’ disease progresses.Methods: We used the MORECare Transparent ExpertConsultation approach to conduct consultation workshopswith experts in statistical methods in P&EoLC research.Prior to workshops participants were sent overviews of pertinentissues in statistical methods in P&EoLC. Followingworkshop presentations and discussion, nominal grouptechniques were used to produce candidate recommendations.These were subsequently rated online by participatingexperts. Descriptive statistics were employed to permitanalysis of consensus and rated importance. Narrative commentswere collated.Results: The statistical methods expert workshop comprised20 participants making 19 recommendations. Therewas broad agreement across most recommendations, thetop 5 recommendations were:1. Types and amount of missing data should be reportedalong with imputation methods.2. Pattern of missing data should be investigated to informimputation method.3. A statistical analysis plan should be in place.4. A taxonomy should be devised to define types ofattrition.5. Use of transition questions and minimally important differenceapproach provides insight into response shift.Conclusions: When designing studies in P&EoLC it is recommendedthat high rates of attrition should not be seen asindicative of poor design and that a clear statistical analysisplan is in place to account for missing data and attrition. Moreresearch is required in statistical methods to assess theseareas but also develop the emerging area of response shift.

KW - research methods

U2 - 10.1177/0269216312446391

DO - 10.1177/0269216312446391

M3 - Meeting abstract

VL - 26

SP - 416

EP - 417

JO - Palliative Medicine

JF - Palliative Medicine

SN - 0269-2163

IS - 4

M1 - OA42

ER -